Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Economic philosophy under question

By Ben Rees - posted Wednesday, 4 December 2024


Y= C+ I+ G+ (X-M)

Y= National Income

C == Consumption expenditure

Advertisement

G = Government

(X-M) = Net exports

The fall in consumption from 59.7% of GDP in 1983 to 51% represents a redistribution of national income from consumption to other sectors of the economy represented in the national income equation. Our informed commentators appear blissfully unaware of the sharp decline in Household Consumption from 56.8% of GDP in 2016 to 48.7% in 2022. Post Covid there has been some recovery in Household Consumption to 51% in 2024. No doubt this explains government household support programs which are consistent with underconsumption theory from pre 1920's.

Meanwhile Compensation of Employees falls from 54.9% of GDP in 1983 to 45% in 2024. The contraction in compensation of Employees would explain the decline in household consumption expenditure as a percentage of GDP. The contraction of compensation of employees will be directly related to income distribution resulting from industrial policy, and net imports post 1983.

Compiled from RBA Statistical tables online

Advertisement

Chart 2 provides an insight into the impact of applied economic policy upon the labour force from 1978 to 2024. The interesting phenomenon is that the Participation Rate and Part Time Employment curves share a common trend line. Moreover, from 1982 onwards declining unemployment appears to have been achieved by restructuring the labour force between full time and part time employment. As part time employment includes low-income employment, the rise in part time employment provides a reasonable explanation of the declining share of wages percentage in GDP. It also raises questions over employment and unemployment statistics measured by statistical sampling.

III Monetary & exchange rate policy

Policy framework was influenced by the academic literature, but the academic debate on monetary policy has not run parallel with problems faced by practitioners.Stephen Grenville RBA Annual Conference, 1997

The collapse of post War Keynesian economics and the inflation of the early 1970's, fostered a move to monetarism pursuing monetary targets. Monetary targets were first implemented in Australia in 1976 under the Fraser Administration. Monetary targeting finally broke down in 1985 when it was abandoned by the Hawke Government. However, some eight advanced economies adopted what Stephen Grenville[i] identifies in his 1997 RBA Paper as pragmatic monetarism.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben Rees is both a farmer and a research economist. He has been a contributor to QUT research projects such as Rebuilding Rural Australia. Over the years he has been keynote and guest speaker at national and local rural meetings and conferences. Ben also participated in a 2004 Monash Farm Forum.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben Rees

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ben Rees
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy