Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

!00% renewables = 100% unaffordables

By Geoff Carmody - posted Friday, 19 July 2024


100% renewables, plus 100% battery 'firming', is an unaffordable pipe dream.

Batteries are the weakest link in the 100% renewables supply chain. Their capacity to store dispatchable power is puny, weather-dependent, unreliable, inefficient and extremely expensive.

Consider small changes in seasonal weather only. Assume 100% reliance on batteries for 'firming', smoothing dispatchable power supply across seasons. Batteries store power for half the year, and dispatch it all in the other half. The required battery supply is enormously costly.

Advertisement

Suppose solar power smooths seasonality in the NEM. Assume battery costs fall to just 10% of SA's Hornsdale 'big battery' costs. The back-up batteries for reliability would still cost A$1.2 to A$2.3 trillion dollars. On average, that's about the current A$ value for Australia's entire GDP.

That finding is based on the published performance and cost of SA's Hornsdale 'big battery'. It uses a very simple numerical calculation assuming minor seasonal variations in average solar intermittency. Reality is worse. It must cover larger seasonal variations in solar intermittency.

For solar, see 'Reliable' renewables: What cost battery storage and structural inflation?. For wind, see 'Reliable' wind power: What cost battery storage?

Suppose wind power smooths seasonality in the NEM. Again, assume battery costs fall to 10% of SA's Hornsdale costs. The reliability-required back-up batteries would still cost A$0.6 to A$1.2 trillion dollars. On average, that's about half the current A$ value for Australia's entire GDP.

Why are wind power's seasonal smoothing battery costs less ruinously expensive than for solar power? On average, wind is less intermittent than solar power. It's still a long, long way from 24/7 reliable base-load power across the seasons.

Reliance on solar and wind, plus batteries,for seasonal smoothing alone, is unaffordable.

Advertisement

Back-up batteries for 100% reliance on solar and wind, for seasonality smoothing alone, would eat up the equivalent of 50% to 100% of the value of Australia's entire production.

This is just for the cost of batteries to smooth small seasonal renewables intermittency variations.

Reality is more costly. The conclusions above ignore other renewables costs.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

24 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody was a director of Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He died on October 27, 2024. He favoured a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 24 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy