Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

!00% renewables = 100% unaffordables

By Geoff Carmody - posted Friday, 19 July 2024


The third step is to put energy policy changes currently under contemplation on hold. If we want to get to Dublin, best we don't start from here. We need a better road map to a clear destination.

The fourth step is to compile independent evidence for power choices needed in the long term. This won't be easy. Bipartisan support is needed to 'firm' investment expectations themselves.

Who should be members of an independent review panel? Private sector engineers with relevant experience should dominate. Maybe one or two economists knowledgeable in the field to keep an accurate eye on energy source costs, properly and comparably measured. Ideally, no, or few, official agencies financed by the taxpayer. These days, these agencies' independence is affected by political pressures from their ministerial masters, whether they admit it or not. Last, neither politicians of any tribe nor their advocate supporters should be included.

Advertisement

Getting clear advice will still be difficult in practice. As Michael Crichton concluded in his reference-thick climate change novel State of Fear (Harper Collins, 2004):

Everybody has an agenda. Except me.

Quite so.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

24 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody is Director, Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He favours a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 24 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy