Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Even ‘God’ made mistakes

By John Mikkelsen - posted Tuesday, 19 March 2024


Bundaberg, like the rest of Australia, always lapped up a gory story, dating back to the days of "the Pressler trial" following the bloody murder of his cane farmer neighbours in what was apparently a love triangle gone horribly wrong.

This is how that outcome was reported: "May 15, 1959: 30-year-old Marjorie Frances Golchert and her 33-year-old husband Clifford John Golchert, 33, were bashed and shot to death by their neighbour, Neville William Pressler, at their home in Kalkie, Queensland. Marjorie and Clifford were found four days after their deaths with a .22 rifle and a half eaten apple nearby. Police spent six weeks searching across Queensland for their killer. Pressler flew under the radar, even acting as a pallbearer at the funeral of the Golcherts. On July 1, police arrested him…"

This latest shooting fortunately wasn't a murder, but it had elements of our wild frontier days which I was sure our readers would enjoy. I typed my colourful copy that night on a battered old Remington and handed it to Rod, the chief night sub.

Advertisement

"Great story, John, I'll run this as the lead on page 3".

That was good to hear. Page 3 was almost as good as page 1, which was usually reserved for important national or international news in those days.

I felt chuffed as I went back to report the main talking points among the Red Cross ladies.

Then the phone rang. It was one of the city's prominent solicitors acting for the defendant, who wanted to talk to me about the court case. His suspicions had been aroused by the fact there was no reporter present. He had guessed I may have spoken to the prosecutor or a police witness. I confirmed I had.

"What did they tell you?"

"Well they outlined their case against your client. They told me what happened".

Advertisement

" You can't print any of that! None of it was stated in court, it was just another appearance and an adjournment to a later date while we prepare our defence".

"I've already handed the report in. It's probably being type-set by now".

"Hold everything. I'm coming down there right now!"

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Mikkelsen is a long term journalist, former regional newspaper editor, now freelance writer. He is also the author of Amazon Books memoir Don't Call Me Nev.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Mikkelsen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Mikkelsen
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy