Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The economic debate 2024 - monetary policy

By Ben Rees - posted Monday, 22 January 2024


Chart 3

Compiled from RBA statistical tables online

Advertisement

The change in sectoral contributions to GDPr are indisputable. Compensation of employees has fallen from 51.5% in 1984 to 46% in 2023.Gross operating surplus of non-financial corporations has risen from 15.6% in 1984 to peak at 24.8% in 2020. Government demand has remained relatively constant; but the income support programs during COVID are there exposed for all to see peaking in 2020. Business investment has declined from a peak of 17.8% in 2012to 12.1% in 2023. Meanwhile dwelling investment remains relatively constant from 1984 to 2023.

When Chart 3 is understood, it becomes clear that structural reform has been substantial. Media commentary from all levels seem out of touch with reality. Political commentary from all quarters appears little more than ill-informed ideology.

Applied economic policy becomes the explanation of long-term structural decline in the economy. As the RBA has been responsible for two major arms of macroeconomic policy since 1993 i.e external balance and applied monetary policy, the competence of that institution becomes the focus of attention.

Legitimate criticism of the RBA revolves around its move to supply side monetary policy based upon the economic philosophies of monetarism and general equilibrium theory. This discussion has demonstrated the short comings of supply side monetary policy which leads to the conclusion that supply side theory is nothing more than a failed economic ideology from the past.

Monetary policy division of the economy into a high-income low-income class system is unforgivable in the twenty first century. There needs to be a major economic summit to chart a way forward that will restructure the Australian economy into a more moral economic system. In the meantime, the Australian Government should reclaim its Constitutional right to control both external and internal balance. The RBA needs to return to its original role of administering monetary policy on a day-by-day basis.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben Rees is both a farmer and a research economist. He has been a contributor to QUT research projects such as Rebuilding Rural Australia. Over the years he has been keynote and guest speaker at national and local rural meetings and conferences. Ben also participated in a 2004 Monash Farm Forum.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben Rees

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ben Rees
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy