Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Can the US handle conflict on 3 fronts?

By Graham Young - posted Monday, 6 November 2023


Israel has an economy four times the size of Ukraine's, but in an area Mr. Mearsheimer refers to as "Greater Israel" being Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank, the Jews represent around 7.2 million souls, and the Arabs about 7.2 million as well.

In both these cases, without outside military aid, including the provision of materiel, the position of the U.S.'s allies is fraught.

This means as the United States tries to pivot, it is operating on three fronts.

Advertisement

Manufacture capacity debacle

I think things are more dire than Mr. Mearsheimer's analysis suggests because when it comes to manufacturing, the West is in a disastrous position.

During the last 20 or more years, we have outsourced much of our manufacturing to China. This has turned China into a great power, fattened the balance sheets of Australian miners, and at the same time crowded out the shelves of households with electronic goods.

So far, so good. But it has also hollowed out our ability to manufacture, as well as centralising the production of some strategic elements in China.

For example, China dominates the rare earths market with 84 percent of world production, and these are used for the latest generation of hi-tech weaponry.

U.S. military manufacturing capacity has also declined to the extent where there are doubts as to whether Australia can obtain the AUKUS nuclear submarines from the U.S. because they might not be able to meet their own resupply needs for the ships, let alone supply others with them.

At the same time that manufacturing has been hollowed-out, we are also crippling the cost-effectiveness of what manufacturing we have by attempting to run a modern economy on windmills and solar panels.

Advertisement

China is radically increasing its consumption of fossil fuels for power generation at the same time as it hedges its bets with nuclear. Renewables are a tiny proportion of their overall power generation.

China's labour productivity is also such that its military is rapidly surpassing the U.S. in terms of size.

In 2005 the Chinese navy had just over 200 principal combat ships, and the U.S. had just less than 300. Not even 20 years later, the U.S. has 294, while China has 351. At the same time, the West has made it more difficult to extract domestic fossil fuels, forcing the price up, and increasing the West's reliance on the Arab Middle East (which in terms of the current Middle East war is a potential transfer of power to Israel's enemies), as well as unsavoury suppliers like Venezuela.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

19 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 19 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy