Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Airbnb is not responsible for our housing crisis

By Graham Young - posted Thursday, 14 September 2023


The report points to many positive factors about short stay. It builds the local tourism industry, provides support for many local businesses, and also may provide an income stream to support existing homeowners, perhaps allowing them to service a mortgage instead of having to sell up.

It also provides competition to local hotels and motels, forcing them to keep their tariffs down-another boon to the tourism industry.

While some short stay is probably withdrawn from the long-term rental pool, a lot of it represents housing that was always devoted to holiday rentals, so there has been no change of use at all.

Advertisement

Australia expects somewhere around 700,000 net migrants in the next two years. That will require somewhere around 280,000 dwellings, which represents around 2.8 percent of our dwelling stock, and will have to be built new.

How much does a static 1 percent of housing stock add to demand, compared to a dynamic 2.8 percent?

Short stay actually increases the productivity of our residential housing stock, and that's a good thing for everyone.

If it raises prices, that should be a signal to developers to build more, and that will fix any housing crisis.

Of course, they won't be able to build that stock so easily unless councils and state governments simplify their planning regulations and provide the infrastructure necessary to get work going.

While that sort of work might be seen as unglamorous, if it is seen at all, in the long run, they will have happier citizens who will be more likely to re-elect them. Picking on short stay plays into our grievance culture and not much more.

Advertisement

In the end, a good housing policy means there is housing available for everyone and every need. It does not mean you restrict who can come in to make the existing housing stock adequate.

The system most likely to produce that outcome is one where individual property owners are free to make the decisions that suit them best with their property, and there is a development industry unconstrained by regulations to help them make those decisions most effectively.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This article was first published in the Epoch Times.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy