Why Albanese is worse than Morrison

You don't like 1.9% population growth? Look over there at 1.5% economic growth. Australia generates yet another per-capita recession.

Discount Labor's Climate Action spin. Their absurdity is of fixing the migration system under massive immigration. The Labor-Greens mockery is to fix rental/housing affordability under relentless population growth.

It doesn't matter how often the Guardian and ABC correspondents sandpaper the ball, IGR's institutionalised mass migration cruels housing affordability for Australians. It's nearly four times higher than the average annual migration in 20^thcentury Australia.

In the October 2022 Budget, the Treasurer targeted net migration of 235,000 each year from 2022-23 to 2025-26. By May 2023, that was suddenly 400,000, 315,000, 260,000, and 260,000. Gosh, his August IGR is back at 235,000, which is the same as the Morrison IGR of 2021.

He's just making it up as he goes. His IGR targets 40 million by 2062, yet this is touted as a slow growing population.

Launching IGR he smirked, "more people will be renting for life", it's the "end of complacency" - the end of equality, more likely.

Like Rudd, Albanese's first loyalty is globalism.

Why would Albanese go to population extremes? He's not just servicing powerful donors, he's a globalist. The breadcrumbs lead back to the UN.

Both Rudd and Albanese affect Net Zero blazers in international climate clubs, which distract attention from the eight billion humans. There are 26 million Australians.

Population generates emissions/consumption/GDP. That's not quantum mechanics or string theory. In Australia, population is way easier to manage than emissions.

Albanese's Open Borders Australia is an endless growth of a democracy of stakeholders, which is more destructive of cohesion and equality than Morrison's sexism and pugnacity.

Australian Liam Young has already written and filmed the ultimate globalist fantasy. Ten billion living in one joyous planet city, as the rest of earth 're-wilds'