Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Insurmountable challenges ahead for a new Thai government

By Murray Hunter - posted Monday, 22 May 2023


One week after the May 14 election, the members of the Prayut-Chan-O-Cha government are carrying on business, as if nothing happened. The young Move Forward Party (MFP) leader Pita Limjaroenrat is trying to assemble a coalition and support from the senate that will give him the 376 votes necessary to elect him prime minister.

In Thailand, the PM is not the person who commands the majority of seats in the lower house. The vote for prime minister is undertaken from a bicameral vote of both the lower house and 250 member senate. Currently Pita has support from 314 MPs designate in the 500 member lower house. That means Pita will have to win over 66 senators from the military appointed senate to acquire enough votes to become Thailand's next prime minister.

The only other alternative is for Pita to gain the support of Anutin Charnvirakul's Bhumjaithai Party, and retain Anutin as a deputy prime minister. This is something MFP supporters and Pheu Thai wouldn't accept.

Advertisement

The probability of gaining the support of 66 senators would be an unprecedented shift in support away from the establishment and military towards the people. One might even include royalty. Any senator who voted for a prime ministerial candidate with the abolishment of Section 112 on the government platform, would face consequences.

Under such circumstances, the present government combining Bhumjaithai Party (70), Palang Pracharath Party (40), United Thai Nation Party (25), Democrat Party (25), and the Charttaipattana Party (10), have 181 seats and with the support of the senate, would have 431 votes for their prime ministerial candidate. There is a possibility that Anutin, who has very close ties with the royal family, military, and the elite business families in Thailand, may rise as a potential compromise candidate.

However, Anutin would have a minority government in the lower house, which would potentially be unstable and unable to govern.

That's the mathematics the general election and current constitutional framework provides for the selection of Thailand's next prime minister.

Pita and his MFP topped the opinion polls before the election. This was a shock to the establishment, where there was a general consensus, they would be dealing with Pheu Thai. However, Pheu Thai lost a lot of urban support to MFB, and became the second in the seat tally.

The pro-US, China suspicious stance of the MFB would mean a major shift in foreign policy for the Thai government. Not many within the establishment want to change the status quo on this issue.

Advertisement

The Thai establishment was caught off guard with the overwhelming support the radical young party obtained in the election and had expected the Thaksin supported Pheu Thai to finish on top. There are rumours the former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, in self-exile, after being ousted in the military coup in 2014, while he was out of the country at the United Nations in New York, had done a number of deals with Prayut, the military, and even the king. The offer of 'B' class ministries to Pheu Thai, which include commerce, transport, agriculture, digital economy and society, tourism, and industry, are not inspiring for the party leadership.

Pheu Thai also has a separate stance on the Section 112 amendment, declaring it would leave it intact. This is reassuring to the establishment. Thus, there are rumours of talks, where Pheu Thai may be trying to forge another coalition with the parties in the out-going government to form a coalition. This however, would be totally unacceptable to the remnants of the 'red shirts', who suffered so much during the crack downs, immediately following the 2014 coup. Many 'red shirts' also lost their lives in the Bangkok streets under the Democrat government led by Abhisit Vejjajiva in 2010. Including the Democrats would be a major barrier.

The biggest threat is yet to play out

A member of the pro-military Palang Pracharath Party has lodged a complaint against Pita. Its alleged that Pita breaches the electoral law by holding shares in a media company, iTV which ceased operations in 2006. The EC has not yet decided whether to refer the matter to the Constitutional Court. Section 98 of the Thai Constitution disallows MPs to hold equity in the media. Although, Pita claims his shareholding is held in the estate from his late father, any court verdict on the matter is unpredictable.

This move has the same hallmarks of the case against the Former Move Forward Party, where the then leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit was disqualified as an MP in 2019, after the general election results.

Pita has been holding press conferences, media interviews, and framing up the signing of a coalition MOU, scheduled for May 22, to enhance the perception of his legitimacy as the natural prime ministerial candidate. However, this may be premature, as 'democracy' Thai style, is much more complex and intriguing than just simply winning the general election. These media appearances may have shown up Pita's and MFP's inexperience. Pita has unintentionally painted himself as a target. The handful of senators who came out in support of voting for Pita will be dealt with to ensure the senate remains solidly behind the establishment.

There are two other games in town, other than Pita's quest for the prime ministership. This may not be the watershed election many are claiming will change the trajectory of Thai politics. More likely this will be the lowering of the Thai silk curtain to protect the establishment.

If no government can be formed, then the spectre of another military coup will arise on the premise of political instability, and the parliament being unable to form any stable government.

It will take two months for the Electoral Commission to certify the results. This gives all parties time to compromise. A lot can happen in politics over two months. Meantime the Prayut government still occupies Government House in the centre of Bangkok, and the moving trucks are no where to be seen.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published in the Eurasia Review on May 21, 2023.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Murray Hunter is an associate professor at the University Malaysia Perlis. He blogs at Murray Hunter.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Murray Hunter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Murray Hunter
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy