Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Howard government's review did not recommend abolishing ATSIC

By Brian Johnstone - posted Thursday, 20 May 2004


At the risk of further embarrassment to backbencher Scullion I won't go on.

He was clearly there to talk, not listen.

If the federal government can spend $1 million of taxpayer's money to conduct a review of an organisation, publicly lie about what it found, and then leave it to the media to inform members of the review panel about its official response, what are the prospects for influence of Howard's hand-picked group "of distinguished Indigenous people to advise the government on a purely advisory basis in relation to Aboriginal affairs"?

Advertisement

One suspects it will be absolutely none.

This all raises one key question in my mind.

Are there any "distinguished Indigenous people" out there who are clever enough to do the job and yet dumb enough to take it?

Put Howard's claim that this has resulted from an examination of the review report and also "a very extensive examination of Indigenous affairs policy," against what Jackie Huggins had to say on national television.

There has been no extensive examination of Indigenous affairs policy. This is what the review report called for.

You'll find it clearly articulated in its report.

Advertisement

It says: "Any changes to ATSIC's program delivery role should be considered as part of a Commonwealth/State/Territory examination of the most effective delivery of all services and programs of significance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians."

I humbly suggest Scullion go back and read the review report before the parliamentary debate on Howard's ATSIC legislation.

The principal recommendation of the review report was not to abolish ATSIC. It was to retain it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All

Article edited by Ian Miller.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

First published in the National Indigenous Times.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brian Johnstone is a columnist for the National Indigenous Times. He was Director of Media and Marketing at the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission between April 1998 and December 2002. Before taking up that position he was a senior advisor to former Federal Labor Minister, Senator Bob Collins, and a senior correspondent with Australian Associated Press.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brian Johnstone
Related Links
ATSIC Review website
Department of Immigration and Mulitcultural and Indigenous Affairs
Photo of Brian Johnstone
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy