Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Google and Facebook should abandon Australian news

By Graham Young - posted Friday, 5 February 2021


What Google and Facebook do is display snippets of information from news websites so that readers know what information is there and are attracted to click on it. The media are complicit in this because they specifically dress their pieces up with headings, images and metadata so that they get the best displays on the search engine pages.

There are real problems with the social media giants, but it has nothing to do with them "stealing" content from news organisations, and this government/media proposal is a distraction from dealing with those real problems.

Google and Facebook use their almost monopoly status to rig political discussions. They pick and choose what opinions and facts will be made public, and they make undeclared contributions to political campaigns by biasing their algorithms.

Advertisement

They even de-platformed the head of the most powerful country on earth on the pretext of policy breaches.

They have a lot to be held accountable for, but that doesn't justify the government hitting them with a discriminatory tax to favour legacy media cronies.

If Google or Facebook refuse to carry Australian news, that would just be commercial good sense. If they entirely desert the Australian market, that is likely to be little skin off their nose – a market of 25 million eyeballs is Lilliputian – and fix some of the other problems by introducing competition into the search market, until those search engines are targeted in turn.

If the government thinks Google and Facebook should provide the service as a community service, then let them pay them a community service obligation payment which they could then be distributed amongst the legacy media on a per click basis.

Of course, this would effectively be a government payment to legacy media, and a reward to media companies for bad management. I wouldn't recommend it, but public assets being syphoned off for the benefit of select media proprietors is nothing new in Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This article was first published in The Spectator.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy