Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The robo-debt pile-on

By Brendan O'Reilly - posted Friday, 5 June 2020


Bill Shorten also announced that Gordon Legal would launch a class action on behalf of robo-debt victims, which may end up costing the Government several hundred million dollars more. Attorney General Christian Porter said debts raised before 2015 based on income averaging could be unlawful, and that there would be a statute of limitation on those cases.

The pile-on surrounding robo-bebt, which largely portrays identified debtors as victims, involves an incomplete narrative. A stark reality is that, for any welfare recipient on social security for a full financial year, the total of the 26 fortnightly incomes they declared should match the annual figure available from ATO. My guess is that most of the $721 million about to repaid to welfare recipients probably represents genuine (albeit inadequately proven) overpayments.

Stuart Robert, Minister for Government Services in July 2019 confirmed in Parliament that as many as one in five of the debt recovery notices issued might be incorrect. He further stated that "of the 800,000 income compliance reviews since 1 July 2016 that have been finalised, 80 per cent have resulted in a debt being collected. To give some focus to that, right now across Australia, as at 30 June 2019, there are 1.54 million outstanding social welfare debts with a value of just shy of $5 billion".

Advertisement

Repaying $721 million will not be the end of the story because recent developments suggest that the government is getting ready to have a second crack at recovering some of this money.

Single Touch Payroll (STP) began from 1 July 2018 for employers with 20 or more employees. It is now mandatory from 1 July 2019 for Australian businesses of all sizes. With STP employees' payroll information is reported to ATO each time employers pay them through STP-enabled software. All this means that ATO data can now be matched to Centrelink data in real time rather than estimated later.

It is not clear how much of Centrelink overpayments will be targeted under a revised recovery scheme. We already know that the government won't pursue overpayments dating prior to 2015. My guess is that the government will target overpayments that can be identified under STP, which means that only payments made in 2018-19 and 2019-20 will be reviewed.

Overall, up to a billion dollars may shortly be refunded to Robodebt victims. A high proportion of this will have been for genuine debts dating before July 2018. Whatever about more recent overpayments, these older debts may never be recovered and the government/taxpayer will be permanently out-of-pocket.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

21 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brendan O’Reilly is a retired commonwealth public servant with a background in economics and accounting. He is currently pursuing private business interests.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brendan O'Reilly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 21 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy