Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia’s economy after COVID-19

By Chris Lewis - posted Thursday, 23 April 2020


If high youth unemployment persists and grows, do we again establish National Service or something similar for any unemployed 18-22?

With regard to taxation, can we impose a turnover tax on global corporations who often pay no tax. The Australian Tax Office reported that of 2,214 entities (1,197 foreign-owned) examined for the 2017-18 period, 710 still paid no tax despite tougher anti-avoidance laws. For example, Google and Facebook pay less than $40 million in tax as much revenue is still channelled via low-tax countries like Singapore.

Do we really need to pay senior public servants so much pay?

Advertisement

Do we really need to fund the ABC and elite sport so extensively?

Why not fund elite sport (and stadium refurbishments) through a national lottery as the UK does.

Do we attach ties to foreign aid which can deliver benefit to both the recipient country and Australia, say through investment in local manufacturing production which can build wealth in the recipient country and provide cheaper manufacturing products for our country, rather than rely upon China for just about everything.

Do we spend billions on water infrastructure to deliver water to Australia’s dry interior to help food production and help water proof vulnerable communities?  

Do we again examine superannuation tax breaks and the fairness of franking credits?

Should Australian governments utilise an extremely low interest rate environment, predicted in 2018 to last for the next 20 years, to borrow and improve important physical structures that aid society and economic expansion such as roads, bridges, ports, public transport, and sewer systems?

Advertisement

Do we draw upon the Future Fund and Industry and Retail Super Funds (worth around $2 trillion in long term capital)?

In the end, however, government must take the lead and help revive Australia in order to create greater per capita wealth rather than rely on factors such as exports to China and high levels of immigration.  

If we don’t act soon to diversify our economy, our best days in terms of having a very high standard of living (and reasonable societal equity) may be confined to the pages of history.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Lewis, who completed a First Class Honours degree and PhD (Commonwealth scholarship) at Monash University, has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Lewis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy