Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why China had to negotiate with Trump

By Michael Knox - posted Thursday, 24 October 2019


The increase in growth in services is generating increasing demand for imports but their ability to produce exports to counterbalance that is declining. The result of that is that the current account surplus has almost completely disappeared. The estimates by the IMF is that the surplus this year is 1% of GDP and next year it will be less than 0.7% GDP.

A worse problem is the lack of capital inflow into China. Previously the Chinese economy was developing by migration of particularly US firms into China. And that was because US firms could take their capital, both intellectual and financial, and move to China and set up manufacturing concerns to sell their products back to the US. But this negotiation that Trump has entered into has stopped that process dead.

If you're in a country which is going to have increasing current account problems, you've got to get capital inflow to balance your increasing demand for foreign imports. When you're not getting the migration of capital then you have to go to the World Capital Market. This means you have to open up the Chinese capital market. Now there are endless risks about that for any foreign firm going into that market in terms of the potential domestic instability of the Chinese capital market but I'll talk about that another time.

Advertisement

Conclusion

So, the bottom line here is that the Chinese are only offering these concessions because they have to. They have to import more grain because they've got a problem with domestic food prices caused from a sudden pork shortage. This must be fixed immediately to avoid any potential political instability.

They also have an increasing problem financing their current account and therefore they need to open up the capital market so they can begin to import capital; neither of those things are because they wanted to, both of them are because they have to.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published by Morgans.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this report is provided to you by Morgans Financial Limited as general advice only, and is made without consideration of an individual’s relevant personal circumstances. Morgans Financial Limited ABN 49 010 669 726, its related bodies corporate, directors and officers, employees, authorised representatives and agents (“Morgans”) do not accept any liability for any loss or damage arising from or in connection with any action taken or not taken on the basis of information contained in this report, or for any errors or omissions contained within. It is recommended that any persons who wish to act upon this report consult with their Morgans investment adviser before doing so. Those acting upon such information without advice do so entirely at their own risk.

This report was prepared as private communication to clients of Morgans and is not intended for public circulation, publication or for use by any third party. The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Morgans. While this report is based on information from sources which Morgans believes are reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed reflect Morgans judgement at this date and are subject to change. Morgans is under no obligation to provide revised assessments in the event of changed circumstances. This report does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase any securities and should not be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Knox is Chief Economist and Director of Strategy at Morgans.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Knox

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy