Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Untested migrants risk American lives

By Patrick Basham - posted Tuesday, 2 July 2019


In addition to a very large Latin American influx, migrants from Africa and Asia continue to arrive in the US from the countries listed above, and at rates higher than previous years. The first week of June alone saw 300 Congolese and Angolans arrive in San Antonio, Texas, before quickly dispersing across the country.

Yet, American politicians haven’t warned the public about the potential risk carried by the tens of thousands of untested migrants spread nationwide. If only a small fraction of new migrants has been exposed to any one of a host of infectious diseases, the consequences still may be dire.

Nevertheless, leading American institutions exhibit schizophrenia on this topic. They encourage extreme caution among Americans abroad while, “What you don’t know can’t hurt you” is the operational motto at home.

Advertisement

Back in America, a disquieting politically correct silence contrasts with the announcement that the CDC will initiate an emergency operations center in an effort to combat the Congo’s Ebola outbreak. It also contrasts with the American government’s push back against the spread of vaccine misinformation. For example, the CDC says the best way to prevent mumps is with the MMR vaccine, which is 88 percent effective.

This appropriate public education dovetails with public opinion. A Pew Research Center study, for example, found 82 percent of Americans agree that, “healthy children should be required to be vaccinated to attend school because of potential health risk to others.”

In that vein, perhaps American political leaders should prescribe a national vaccination programme to combat the health threats fueled by a porous border? Such a candid, responsible, and science-based approach would sit well with Americans who shouldn’t have to leave their own country to hear some medical home truths.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Patrick Basham directs the Democracy Institute and is a Cato Institute adjunct scholar.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Patrick Basham

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy