Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Does Trump v Cruz foreshadow irreversible Republican divisions?

By Glen Anderson and Alan Berman - posted Wednesday, 30 March 2016


Republican women – conservative and centrist – may also defect. Their concerns are likely to be amplified if Hillary faces off against Trump in the presidential election. Attacks by Trump against Hillary, especially if they become personal or emotive, could be perceived by Republican women as sexist – even misogynistic.  

Other constituencies within the Republican base such as Latinos and the disabled may also set aside their traditional affiliations and cast their vote for the Democrats to block a Trump presidency.

Segments of the Republican voting military, appalled by Trump’s attack on Vietnam war hero and 2008 Republican presidential nominee, John McCain, may do the same.  

Advertisement

A defection of the sort described above, even if only amounting to 5-10 percent of the Republican base, could have a decisive impact upon the overall election result.

In what might sound the most unexpected of electoral scenarios, Clinton may gain support from anti-Trump Republicans – the so-called “Clinton Republicans” – which would cancel out Trump’s support from the blue collar “Raegan Democrats”.

Does all this sound a bit crazy? If it does, ask yourself this question: what would be the optimal Democratic strategy to take advantage of unprecedented Republican division? More than likely, the Democrats would choose to remain outside the fray and let the Republican candidates destroy themselves. Is this what we are witnessing? To a considerable extent, yes. The Republican candidates receive more television and print coverage than the Democrats, and the Republican primary campaigns have become more about insults and sensationalism than substantive policy debate and presidentialism. This explains why prominent New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd referred to Trump as the “Khardashian” of politics.

Although the Republican presidential candidates are currently dominating the press cycle and becoming household names, this may not deliver the Presidency in November. Entertainment and electability are two different things. Rather, the more overexposed traditional Republicans are to Trump and the more irreversible the divisions between Trump and Cruz become, the greater the chance for a Democratic presidential victory assisted by a de-energised and defecting Republican base. It is just possible that on November 8 2016, “Clinton Republicans” could quietly help to make Hillary Clinton the 45th President of the United States. 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Glen Anderson is a lecturer in law at the University of Newcastle. Dr Anderson researches and teaches in the areas of international law, equity, company and property law. He has formerly taught Australian and international politics.

Dr. Alan Berman, an Adjunct Research Fellow of the Socio-Legal Research Centre at Griffith Law School and a Senior Lecturer in Law at Newcastle Law School, teaches and researches in the areas of crime and Australian society, international human rights law and sexuality and the law.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Glen Anderson
All articles by Alan Berman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy