Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Superseding the Intergenerational Report

By Syd Hickman - posted Friday, 20 March 2015


It used to be a clear priority of governments to encourage home ownership for the social and economic benefits that ensued. Do we still have a long-term commitment to this policy? If so there is much more that can be done than handouts to first-home buyers that only drive up prices.

For most of the past century the question of working hours was a matter of government policy. Now we only worry about getting rid of penalty rates and any sort of protection for workers. One goal, even with big employers such as universities, appears to be the casualisation of the workforce, and around 20% of workers are now casual. Again, this has evolved as a rationalist 'given' without any real discussion. What is the workforce going to look like in 40 years, apart from being older? Casualisation may be the way to go, and four-day weeks for many industries such as public service could solve some problems, but only if there are very strong public health and education systems so that temporary loss of employment income is not catastrophic. High levels of home ownership help too with the flexible repayments, or the eventual freedom from a mortgage. An agreed end goal would make politics more sane.

In health and education, PM John Howard made a huge policy shift to split Australia. He instituted enormous increases in public funding for what is laughably called private health cover and private education. This was different to previous such policies in that it was not just about helping the wealthy to elevate themselves above contact with the masses. It aimed to get ordinary, and even poor people to leave public systems. All subsequent governments have played along with this reconstruction of Australia. Just under half the population now has private health cover and more than a third of kids go to private schools. The universities are progressively being privatised.

Advertisement

Is the goal to remove government from our lives and become as much like the US as possible? Has it been decided by both current major parties that we must have a two tier Australia? Or do we want to preserve the public systems that have done so much to shape Australian society?

At its most simple we face a long term choice between the old idea of Australia as a society committed to equal opportunity and no class pretensions, or a new society, with inferior public systems only for the lower orders. An offshoot of this approach is the fragmenting of society into many cultures, indoctrinated from primary school onward, most of them with little hope of achieving the full potential of their individual members, and all ruled by an elite that exists in a separated world from cradle to grave. We are now on the second track, and the main problem is not just that it is 'unfair', but that it seeks to replace the culture that has made Australia the envy of the world with an alternative that most Australians quite rightly believe is inferior.

An Intergenerational Report that spelled out broad social options, rather than simplistic economic projections, would be very useful. But that would mean inviting the mob to voice opinions contrary to their 'betters'. And no existing political party wants to do that.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syd Hickman has worked as a school teacher, soldier, Commonwealth and State public servant, on the staff of a Premier, as chief of Staff to a Federal Minister and leader of the Opposition, and has survived for more than a decade in the small business world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syd Hickman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy