Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Buying petrol? Then donít fuel around

By Graham Ring - posted Friday, 14 October 2005

This article is a Blatant Plug. I’m using it to draw your attention to a Brilliant Product produced by Brave People.

Opal is a lead-free fuel which does not contain the aromatics that have such a deadly attraction for sniffers. It’s Better Petrol.

Mind you, there are no Big Profits to be made in the production and distribution of Opal. It’s hopelessly uneconomic to produce the fuel in small quantities. Storage is difficult: you can’t keep jam and Vegemite in the same jar.


Transport is expensive: there are lots of miles to cover in the bush - and not so many people there to buy the stuff when it arrives.

In terms of return on investment, the manufacturer would do better flogging heaters in Hawaii.

While the ALP is busy self-immolating, the de-facto leader of the Opposition, Bob Brown, is maintaining pressure on the Howard Government to loosen the purse strings and get Opal into Alice.

To its credit, the government is stumbling in the right direction. The Federal Treasurer recently found $6 million in his other pants to fund the subsidised distribution of Opal to Yulara and points south.

A good start - but no cigar.

This piecemeal policy of subsidising Opal in some areas of the central desert but not others lacks credibility and cohesion, like most of the government’s Indigenous affairs policies.


Health Minister Tony Abbot recently addressed a group of medical students on the subject of working in remote communities. He was able to enlighten them thus: “We can try to preserve a particular type of Indigenous culture, but almost inevitably people living in that particular world are going to have different outcomes in things that we think are important than people who are living in a different kind of world.”

Fifty-odd years earlier, George Orwell said something much more easily understood: “The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink.”

Tangentyre Council Central Australian Youth Link-Up Service (CAYLUS) is right in the thick of things. They’re a lot closer to the action than the word-play warriors sheltering in the parliamentary trenches of Canberra.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published by the National Indigenous Times on October 5, 2005.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Ring is an award-winning writer and a fortnightly National Indigenous Times columnist. He is based in Alice Springs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Ring

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Ring
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy