Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Global realist economics

By Syd Hickman - posted Thursday, 14 November 2013


Over the last thirty years all major industries have become dominated by a shrinking number of global firms. They in turn have a small number of key suppliers. Two companies have 100% of the large commercial aircraft market. Two have 55% of the athletic footwear market, ten have 77% of automobiles, two have 70% of carbonated drinks, and so on. Of suppliers, two make more than half of all car seats, three make 57% of all drink cans, and three make 87% of database software. The list goes on and on.

These dominant firms maintain their position by huge investment in Research and development. In 2008 100 top global firms spent a combined total of around $US300 billion on R&D, making them the powerhouses of change. The top five firms spent more than $US6 billion each, with Toyota outlaying almost $US10 billion.

All this means we live in an increasingly oligopolistic global economy, and challenging the leaders is virtually impossible due to their dominance of future developments. Markets aren't what they used to be, and government powers must adapt to the new realities.

Advertisement

3. As commodities approach peak production levels governments are intervening in new ways.

Let's just think briefly about food. As water shortages, land degradation and population growth bring us closer to peak food production many nations face food supply problems, particularly in times of crisis such as floods or droughts. In 2010 Russia banned grain exports to protect its own food supply. In 2008 five Asian nations, including China and India, restricted rice exports for the same reason.

Governments are also buying land in poor nations to grow crops for their home markets. Sudan has leased 1.5 million hectares of good farmland to the Gulf States, Egypt and South Korea. Kuwait has leased rice fields in Cambodia. China, Japan and others have taken up land across Africa. Ethiopia has handed over large areas of land despite being dependent on food imports for survival of its rapidly growing population.

At one level this is all good and market-driven. But what happens when shortages occur and locals see food that they desperately need being shipped off to the nations of its owners? The whole point of the investment is to ensure that market forces can be overcome when it is not possible for higher prices to drive more production. The impact will be far worse than that of profit shifting to avoid tax.

China is leading the way in markets for other critical commodities with moves to pre-empt future market crises. They are very realistic in doing so. Nations relying on markets to provide will pay extortionate prices or miss out on vital needs or both.

There are many other huge pressures building up. Population imbalances, environmental degradation (including climate change), the return of financial crisis, the end of cheap fuel and an impending wide range of commodity shortages all demand more realistic economics. And among all the problems are huge opportunities for those prepared to look for them.

Advertisement

Governments have an expanding role in leading national responses to the new realities. But there is a cost to change, either as taxes or through regulated controls, and forcing people to pay now for future benefits requires real leadership.

The old measure of success has been economic growth. The aim of Australian governments for two centuries has been to use more resources to raise the consumption levels of an expanding population. The new global realist aim is to raise the living standards of a stable population while reducing the consumption of unrenewable resources. That raises questions of quality replacing quantity, a major rebalancing of sectors of the economy, and a huge transition to new energy sources. The price mechanism can help achieve all that but strong government leadership will be required.

The market fundamentalists who deride all planning as "picking winners" and doomed to fail must be ignored. The challenge now is to make the planning as solid as possible, and to use market forces where possible. Not to plan, and not to act on planning, is to fail.

In terms of managing the financial crisis, global realist economics can accept the need for Keynesian deficit spending but absolutely rejects Keynes's idea that you could validly pay people to dig holes and then other people to fill them in. The point of such spending should be to specifically target it at achieving long-term goals such as improving productivity, generating new products or bringing forward necessary spending from the out-years when transition costs will be most onerous.

It's not about changing the settings and letting the system work its magic. It is about driving the system harder until a new stability can be achieved. The transition will take decades but we are already late in starting. It will be interesting to listen to the debates over coming weeks and see if there are any realist moments.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syd Hickman has worked as a school teacher, soldier, Commonwealth and State public servant, on the staff of a Premier, as chief of Staff to a Federal Minister and leader of the Opposition, and has survived for more than a decade in the small business world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syd Hickman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy