Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A good start

By Graham Young - posted Monday, 9 September 2013


It could have passed through the GFC much the same way.

All Rudd needed to do was guarantee the banks deposits (which he did) and keep an eye out for some opportunities to pump prime the economy if need be by building some vital infrastructure while prices were low.

Instead he threw billions of dollars at consumers, which they promptly and rationally saved, and implemented schemes to build infrastructure that no-one needed, like school halls, which were still being built years after the crisis was over.

Advertisement

You can't point to a single policy change that Labor has implemented in office which has improved the efficiency of the economy (and quite a few that have done the opposite).

Instead, by insisting that now is not the time to run a surplus (if not in the greatest boom of our lifetimes when?) their economic policy boils down to spending $50 billion more than we earn each year they've been in power.

They're right, our government debt is small compared to other countries, but at the rate they were increasing it, it wasn't going to stay that way, and voters, who've been consolidating their debt ever since the GFC, know this.

In fact, as the NDIS and Gonski are unfunded past the forward estimates, which is when their biggest impact will hit, debt is likely to accelerate.

Added to this, when they did see the need to get spending and income back into balance, it was almost always by seeing which sector of the economy they could rob.

The mining tax and bank tax are examples of kleptocratic policy where the government hit-up an industry for money it had no legitimate right to using an excuse.

Advertisement

At the same time, changes to the industrial relations laws, plus plenty of nods and winks to the union movement, have been moving Australia in the direction of a less flexible, and ultimately less profitable and fair, economy.

So, the economy was a looming disaster.

But what contributed far more to their defeat was the fact that they were out of touch with the average Australian.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

30 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 30 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy