Many of us think that while unions are affiliated to the Labor Party a group of careerists will manipulate the system to achieve their goals, regardless of how much money the unions give to Labor.
As for the Liberals, we think that, regardless of how much money Coles and Woolworths or BHP and Rio Tinto give, they will have more sway over them than we do. After all the big three mining companies did not change Labor's mining tax by donating money to them.
What they also do not get is the apparent hypocricy of this argument.
Advertisement
On the one hand we have governments all around the country, both Labor and Liberal, telling public servants that they have to tighten their belts. It is called a 'productivity dividend' and it has been foisted on public services for years.
On the other hand, with odd exceptions such as the car industry (i.e. the equivalent of Coles and Woolworths), businesses are told that, if costs are too high, do not come looking to governments looking for a handout.
Likewise if the local football club cannot recruit enough members or enough players it fields fewer teams or folds up.
Yet, when it comes to the inability of political parties to recruit members or attract donors, there is not any suggestion of folding up or cutting back election campaigns. Rather the solution is to sting the taxpayer.
If democracy is as threatened as political parties say and they want us to come to the rescue, they need to convince us that things are as bad as they claim and that their solution will work.
After all, what evidence is there that our throwing more money into the honey pot will not merely mean more television advertisements and more work for pollsters and political consultants?
Advertisement
Why would the problem not be solved by restricting expenditure on election campaigns?
Why should taxpayers fund the administration of political parties? If they cannot sell themselves to recruit members why should that become the taxpayers' problem?
Why should political parties not be like any other business? If they cannot raise the money do not spend it.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
6 posts so far.