Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Economic nostalgia won't solve Australia's problems

By Chris Lewis - posted Tuesday, 16 April 2013


Table 3: Share of global manufacturing exports (non-food)

At the same time, our high reliance upon retail (over 10 per cent of employment at the end of 2012) faces much greater competition from online purchasing with customers able to import any number of individual shipments that is below threshold of $1,000 with no tax or duty to be paid. Nothing has been done after a Productivity Commission concluded that it would cost $2 billion to raise $600 million of extra tax revenue.

Truth is that Australia's adherence to free trade is limited with our struggle with manufacturing and food exports meaning that tougher times lie ahead in terms of generating economic activity.

Advertisement

What are the solutions? More public debt?

More household spending, despite Australia already having one of the highest levels of household debt?

A free trade deal with mercantile and authoritarian China at a time when the former US Treasury Secretary argued that the US needs to do a better job at policing the Chinese cyber menace if the global economic system is to be preserved? It is argued that 'two thirds of American computer software used in China is stolen' and up 'to 20 per cent of China's growth is connected in some way to theft of intellectual property'

Even if recent trends are to occur relatively peacefully, Australia would be wise to observe potential consequences from its current economic policy stance.

Consistent with the evidence in Table 1, Ian Fletcher, an adjunct fellow with the U.S. Business and Industry Council, noted that the decline of manufacturing can hardly be offset by 'exporting soybeans and investment-banking services'.

Fletcher also argued that non-elite service-industry jobs 'are also much more productivity-constrained than manufacturing, so you're never going to be able to pay most people decent wages there'. As jobs are lost offshore, Fletcher argues that a mirage is created under the belief that higher productivity jobs remain yet there is 'no guarantee that the workers who formerly held them will find new jobs of equal or greater value'. This occurs as jobs are lost to foreign nations which subsidise production to get a foothold in strategic industries.

Advertisement

While no sensible commentator would suggest a return to absolute protection to give narrow interest groups special immunity from market discipline, they have good reason to challenge their own losses to other more mercantile nations.

While Fletcher's prefers a 30 per cent flat tariff on all imports to bring back high-value industries like producing flat-panel displays, another article suggests that Western societies should not merely turn a blind eye in the hope of economic gain with investor and business interests given the highest priority, 'while sweeping aside the environment, labour rights, human rights, public health and reasonable regulations'.

No one can imply the answers are easy. They are not. If we are to again have an expanding manufacturing industry we will have to become more competitive, including in terms of labour costs.

But at a time when powerful governments (US, EU and Japan) print money in the hope something magical will happen beyond the need for dramatic reform, don't be fooled by Gillard's recent claim that Australia will be ready for the Asian Century through skills and education, high speed broadband, clean energy and innovation, competition and deregulation, and tax reform (AAP, 4 April 2013).

To be frank, economic policy solutions are not going to be easy, as evident by the ongoing demise of the Australian car-making industry compounded by high dollar, high costs, excess overseas capacity, and by Japan devaluing its currency which makes its cars even cheaper (Matt Chambers and Ewin Hannan, 'End of carmakers 'inevitable' as former Ford president Jac Nasser warns of 'domino effect'', The Australian, 12 April 2013).

Tough times may be ahead, so we need to search hard for a sophisticated way out rather than merely accepting a silly notion that Australia will do well just by relying on minerals and food.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Lewis, who completed a First Class Honours degree and PhD (Commonwealth scholarship) at Monash University, has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Lewis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy