Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Decoding government-speak on the cluster bomb bill

By Michelle Fahy - posted Monday, 20 August 2012


Line 4: "The Australian Government will not approve the stockpiling of cluster munitions in Australia by foreign governments."

After sustained criticism on the hosting of foreign stockpiles, the Defence Minister announced last November that the government will issue a policy statement at the time of Australia's ratification of the Convention stating that the government will not approve the stockpiling of cluster munitions in Australia. This is better than not having such a statement. However, the government has not amended the section of the legislation which explicitly permits countries not party to the Convention to stockpile cluster bombs here. Section 72.42 says:

"Section 72.38 [lists the criminal offences under the Bill] does not apply to the stockpiling, retention or transfer of a cluster munition that is done by a member of the armed forces of a foreign country that is not a party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions…"

Advertisement

Thus the government has created a confusing situation where it says it won't approve foreign stockpiles yet has drafted legislation which plainly allows such stockpiling to occur. In an interview with ABC Radio last November, Stephen Smith refused to explain the contradiction created by his statement, relying on above 'line 1' to deflect the question.

Given the serious flaws in this legislation, and the government's earlier actions behind the scenes to weaken the global ban on these weapons, it's hard to fathom how the government reconciles its actions with its claims that Australia is a "strong supporter of" and "committed to" the Convention. Yet no doubt we'll hear these exact same lines used yet again when the Senate debate starts.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michelle Fahy is a Canberra-based writer and editor. She also acts in a voluntary capacity as a committee member of the Cluster Munition Coalition (Australia) which represents the views of around 25 Australian NGOs on issues related to the successful implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michelle Fahy

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Michelle Fahy
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy