Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is the current sports drug-testing regime fair?

By Chris Lewis - posted Tuesday, 14 August 2012


In contrast to Table 5 which only provides general information of total tests for each sport, the UK, US and Russia all provide comprehensive details about the number of tests conducted on each sport. In the case of Russia, perhaps the best example of data provided of the three agencies, there is also a breakdown of various urine and blood tests for each sport.

And while ASADA stipulated to myself that user-pay figures are subject to confidentiality provisions and are considered commercial-in-confidence, I was amused to read a May 2011 newspaper article which disclosed that ASADA carried out almost 1000 tests on AFL players between November 2009 and October 2010, including for Human Growth Hormone and blood doping.

Simple logic, at least to myself and the few people I have asked, is that all relevant data should be available to scrutinise in regard to the number and type of tests per sport, country, and federation.

Advertisement

To conclude, drug-testing of sport still has some way to go despite massive improvements in recent years.

While it is reported that major pharmaceutical companies are working with anti-doping agencies by alerting them to experimental drugs that could have performance-enhancing side-effects, thus allowing WADA to develop tests before the drug is even on the market, there are already many HGH-releasing peptides on the black market not yet approved by the FDA. There is also the prospect of gene doping, which could mean genetically manipulating cells to produce more EPO or manipulating the cells that regulate muscle mass.

Despite the ongoing catch-up game, and the immense potential of biological passports to catch cheats, it is essential that every measure possible is adopted to ensure that all participating sporting federations and nations act in a similar way. Perhaps they currently still do not.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Lewis, who completed a First Class Honours degree and PhD (Commonwealth scholarship) at Monash University, has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Lewis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy