Truth is that one's view of progressive policies is not irrefutable. While I too would like to see global greenhouse gas emissions reduced, I strongly disagree that a carbon tax will make any substantive difference given Australia's growing reliance on mineral and fuel exports.
As Dr Gideon Polya points out, Australia's 2009 domestic greenhouse gas pollution (including land use) was 600 million tonnes in terms of CO2 equivalent, yet the level increases to 1,415 million tonnes when the full impact of fossil fuel exports was included.
In the end, what is and what is not progressive is subjective and cannot be determined by commentary more in tune with partisan politics. With Labor currently on the nose, and the Coalition likely to win government at the next federal election, political analysis can be a whole lot better when scholars stick to the facts as much as possible.
Advertisement
My view, even after nearly 20 years of political study, is that public opinion remains the ultimate player to support good ideas from each and to counter their silly excesses, at least until this day in Australia. I, for one, do not fear a Coalition victory.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
22 posts so far.
About the Author
Chris Lewis, who completed a First Class Honours degree and PhD (Commonwealth scholarship) at Monash University, has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.