Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Moving on from the age of confrontation

By Everald Compton - posted Monday, 5 March 2012


After all, Australia is a massive continent and can easily accommodate many more farmers, graziers and miners than we now have if we give them the infrastructure to do it in a sustainable fashion.

Fly In — Fly Out

Whether it be true or false, one of the greatest criticisms of the mining industry is that it takes wealth from the geographical heart of Australia and leaves little behind that will improve the social fabric and economical life of the Inland. Nothing typifies this more than the fly in/fly out system of providing workers for their mines.

Advertisement

Recently, the situation became inflammatory when one mining company said that it would fly mineworkers in and out from Asia — but, as usual, there are many sides to every story. The miners will emphasise that workers, whether Australian or otherwise, do not want to live out in the Never Never, and so they have no option but to fly them in and out.

At the same time, social workers will tell you that the system is placing great stresses on the families back home who are left alone for long periods. In the final analysis, they don’t want to be separated. Nor do the workers really want to live in mining towns where the entertainment generally consists of having a few drinks with your mates.

Part of the solution lies in providing the social infrastructure needed to make mining communities liveable. This will require the building of quality housing which is air-conditioned and insect-proof, church schools, satellite university campuses, health services, social and cultural centres, sports facilities, good restaurants and theatres, etc.

In the long term, these good investments will prove to be less costly than that of fly in/fly out.

Not surprisingly, the way forward is a combination of consultation, co-operation and innovation — with no confrontation between miners and governments as to whose responsibility it is to create attractive inland towns and to plan for their future post-mining.

Commonsense tells us that there is no point in having a prosperous nation that has a diminishing quality of life and is socially dysfunctional.

Advertisement

Railways and Ports

It is time that we faced the fact that we do not have railways and ports that are of a quality that will sustain our mines (or any of our industries). We have to admit that they are outmoded and inefficient, thereby placing a heavy burden of cost on exporters.

The long term neglect of providing modern infrastructure for the Surat and Galilee Coal Basins in Queensland and the new food producing regions of northern Australia, particularly the Kimberley, is a prime example of this.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Everald Compton is Chairman of The Longevity Forum, a not for profit entity which is implementing The Blueprint for an Ageing Australia. He was a Founding Director of National Seniors Australia and served as its Chairman for 25 years. Subsequently , he was Chairman for three years of the Federal Government's Advisory Panel on Positive Ageing.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Everald Compton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Everald Compton
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy