Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Moving on from the age of confrontation

By Everald Compton - posted Monday, 5 March 2012


So, our problem is not how we can stop Australia from looking like a moonscape, but how can we make sure that there are plenty of minerals left for the benefit of future generations?

If history is a guide, we should not be worried unduly. In the long saga of mining worldwide, there have been regular booms and busts, just as there have been with the overall world economy — despite all the efforts of eminent economists to remove boom and bust cycles.

But, there is a very positive outlook also. Because mining is more difficult in Australia than in other parts of the world, our mining technology has become very advanced and will enable us to find more minerals, and do so at greater depths than previously envisaged, thereby creating an infinitely larger supply.

Advertisement

It also creates another revenue earner for us, as our unique expertise with minerals should be sold around the world to a greater extent than it is now.

We can be sure that Australia’s current mining boom will end abruptly sometime soon. Efficiently managed and adequately financed miners who relate well to their communities and the environment will survive and prosper, while others will go to the wall. What we have to decide is which ones deserve to survive and make sure that we work co-operatively with them in building a stronger nation. We must remember that mining provides less than 20 per cent of our gross national product every year. Our main effort must be to ensure that the remaining 80 per cent retains and advances its prosperity too — but we won’t achieve this by punishing miners.

We have a desperate need to improve our national productivity in all fields of endeavor through much greater efficiency than we achieve now.

Farmers and Graziers

The confrontation between rural producers and miners has reached a point of unnecessary hysteria, mainly caused by governments putting the whole problem in the too hard basket and running away from it as fast as they can, but also fuelled by local political zealots who are not landowners and whose sole interest is to use this issue to enhance their public profile. To my dying day, I will defend the right of a landholder to tell miners that they have no right to enter his or her property for any reason until a legal agreement is reached through a clearly-defined negotiating process that adequately compensates the owner every year throughout the life of the mine or gas well.

The gas industry is the main offender in this, and while there are some notable exceptions, too many gas drillers behave like Attila the Hun, and this must stop.

Advertisement

While the key issue is, and must always be, the preservation of prime arable land, there are too many farmers whose militancy goes beyond the bounds of reason and sanity. In fact, some of them are enjoying the battle so much, they will be grossly disappointed when it ends.

They will greatly advance their cause if they calm down, as miners do have some rights and not all of them want to destroy good land, nor do they want to buy it cheaply.

Once more, the disease of confrontation cancer is running rampant out in rural Australia, and must be cured so sanity can prevail. This will happen when governments produce an enlightened framework for negotiations. Then, we will get some real results in which everyone can win.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Everald Compton is Chairman of The Longevity Forum, a not for profit entity which is implementing The Blueprint for an Ageing Australia. He was a Founding Director of National Seniors Australia and served as its Chairman for 25 years. Subsequently , he was Chairman for three years of the Federal Government's Advisory Panel on Positive Ageing.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Everald Compton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Everald Compton
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy