Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will

By Marko Beljac - posted Thursday, 1 December 2011


I do not think so. The social welfare state came about, in part, because of the strength of public opinion, most spectacularly demonstrated when Winston Churchill was sent packing from Number 10 following World War Two. This, critically, also relied upon the rise of a strong labour movement dedicated toward moral progress and social change. It is surely no accident that the reassertion of "the vile maxim" has been accompanied by a major assault on organised labour.

I do not believe that neoliberalism demonstrates that we have experienced moral decay. The attitudes of the population have remained largely socially democratic, with strong shades of socialism and libertarianism, throughout the neoliberal era. Intellectual commentary and scholarly work has missed an important point here.

The neoliberal assault has occurred during a period of moral advance. That being the case, how have the two coexisted?

Advertisement

The key point is that neoliberalism has been accompanied by a major offensive against democracy. The objective, to a not inconsiderable degree successfully achieved, has been to shift accountability of government away from people and toward markets. This process lies at the core of the European debt crisis. When power is taken away from people and increasingly shifted toward corporations and markets it is possible for moral progress to coexist with moral decay.

The point here is this.

There are grounds for pessimism. However, if we can apply our moral sense and reconstruct our societies, up to and including systems of global order, to accord with moral principles it would be reasonable to be optimistic about our future prospects.

But this shall require overcoming a sense of despair and fatalism. It pays to be optimistic and to act upon that optimism. So though we might have grounds for pessimism it is surely rational for us, following Pascal, to become optimistic and to channel that optimism into dissidence and activism. The rewards could be huge, not just materially but also spiritually. The alternative is too ugly to even think about.

Another world is possible, if we rid ourselves of the masters of mankind.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Beljac teaches at Swinburne University of Technology, is a board member of the New International Bookshop, and is involved with the Industrial Workers of the World, National Tertiary Education Union, National Union of Workers (community) and Friends of the Earth.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Marko Beljac

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Marko Beljac
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy