Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Psychopaths need to be put on a leash

By Brian Holden - posted Tuesday, 29 November 2011


Serious crimes are committed at times with no witnesses. Crimes are sometimes not even reported. Socio-economic factors, such as poverty, might lead to victims having a distrust of police hence more reason not to report crime. Unreported crime means minor crimes committed by young people go unpunished leading to more serious crimes in adulthood. This was the case with the killers of Anita Cobby.

The humane way to protect ourselves

Chemical lobotomies performed on a dangerous brain should not be an option. There is something horrible in deliberately damaging a brain and removing its 'humanness'.

Advertisement

As a diagnosed psychopath is subconsciously waiting for his victim, he could be kept under 24-hour electronic surveillance and be restricted to the one city or town for the rest of his life. Civil libertarians would object but how likely to object would be the family of 20 year-old Janine Balding who was pulled into a car in broad daylight outside of a major railway station, repeatedly raped, bludgeoned and then drowned? If her killers were under unobtrusive surveillance, Balding would still be alive.

The technology of electronic surveillance is rapidly improving. The ABC recently ran a feature titled: The brain on trial. This program looked at the feasibility of brain scans becoming hard evidence in court. We may be on the way to stopping exceptionally bad brains from directing hands to perform exceptionally bad deeds.

But, expecting that one in every 100 of the population be under surveillance in the near future is expecting far too much. What we must do is have those convicted of torturing animals under permanent surveillance. Isn't removing the possibility of a child stepping off a school bus and stepping straight into a hell worth that one sacrifice of our civil liberties?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brian Holden has been retired since 1988. He advises that if you can keep physically and mentally active, retirement can be the best time of your life.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brian Holden

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Brian Holden
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy