Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Policing in the 21st century: facing up to the challenges of the privatisation of policing

By Duncan Kerr - posted Friday, 15 June 2001


The group has not only procured private security controls, it has also undertaken community activities – meeting with elders of the Aboriginal community, supplying equipment to the local soccer team. Apparently it is keen to become involved in local projects such as the creation of murals on railway walls, retarring streets and promotion of the arts district.

So what is so wrong with business stepping in to help the community where government has failed? Well, the residents have at least one pertinent concern – they fear that if the patrol results in a fall-off in crime complaints to the police, this will be used as justification for the closure of the Redfern police station.

I think there are also other, more universal questions which must be asked and answered, including:

Advertisement
  • Will private policing patrols attempt to become involved in bringing offenders within the criminal justice system, or will their role be simply deterrence and dispersement of criminal activity?
  • How will the priorities and actions of private patrols be determined? If it is by the clients who have paid for their services by what mechanism will those who can’t afford to pay be able to have a say in the patrol’s activities?
  • If the police patrols are replaced by private patrols, what would happen if, for whatever reason – say a change in investment priority – the purchasers of private policing withdraw their financial support for private security? And
  • What will happen when groups such as the Chippendale Crime Control Committee, or residents of gated communities, start insisting that, since they don’t use the public police system they should no longer have to pay to support the public police system – as is starting to happen in the United States?

The instinctive response for police federations, and for those of us on the left of the political spectrum, is to say that private policing is fraught with too many dangers, too many problems, and it should be rejected out of hand.

Yet private policing is a growing phenomenon we can not ignore. Peter Grabosky, from the Australian Institute of Criminology, even claims that whether the public or the private sector carries out law enforcement is a misplaced question. He thinks that we have already gone so far along the privatisation path that the real question now is what blend of institutional forms is best suited to any given task.

Is he right? Do we have to placidly accept the encroachment of private agencies into all aspects of law enforcement? I hope not, because there are reasons to be concerned about the trends towards privatisation of policing. There are two principal reasons.

The first is accountability. No-one claims that public policing is error free, nor that instances of abuse and corruption do not exist – but public policing is under constant public scrutiny and the public can demand accountability through their own directly elected members of Parliament. By contrast, there are few processes of accountability for misuse in private police bodies.

The second reason is inequality. If policing becomes a residual service, provided only where private individuals and corporations cannot afford their own private protection services, public policing soon will cease to be funded adequately and the least well off in our community will again suffer from the contraction of the public sphere in the increasingly post-welfare state. Vigilantism will increase and a vicious spiral towards a society very different to that which we wish to endow to our children will set in.

Advertisement

But there is one aspect of Grabosky’s position which is unarguably correct – we have to start thinking innovatively, strategically, logically. If private policing is here to stay, what are we going to do with it?

And just as importantly, how are we going to stop it becoming everything that we don’t want and that we fear it could become?

South Australian Shadow Police Minister Patrick Conlon told me when we were both talking to a forum of neighbourhood watch coordinators that local governments in South Australia have considered paying private agencies to carry out one of the traditionally core functions of the police: street patrols. This is not supporting community patrols, it is contracting private policing.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This is an edited version of a speech given to the Police Federation Of Australia (South Australia) on April 30 2001.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Hon. Duncan Kerr is Federal member for Denison (Tas) and was Federal Attorney General and Minister for Justice in the Keating government. He is author of Elect the Ambassador: Building Democracy in a Globalised World.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Duncan Kerr
Related Links
Australian Federal Police
Duncan Kerr's Home Page
Photo of Duncan Kerr
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy