Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Multicultural food can't mask divisions

By Ben-Peter Terpstra - posted Thursday, 5 May 2011


The Labor-sounding ActNow website hopes you'll buy the big M. It asks:"Where would you be without the local Chinese takeaway? Or your daily cappuccino? These are just a few food clichés that help to identify what multiculturalism means to Australia, but what's actually beyond butter chicken and pad Thai?"

More about Labor later. For now, let's face the facts: associating superior food with multiculturalism is more than a cliché – it's misleading. Why? Because one can live in a nation where there are great cappuccinos and superb Chinese takeaways, without multiculturalism. I have at least.

Leaving Japan aside though, such arguments irritate many Australians for other reasons. Take the experiences of (say) Sydney's more representative working-class families (worlds apart from the upper-middle classes).

Advertisement

While a Labor bureaucrat eats a jolly good Indian meal in an upmarket eatery, his gardener is unable to order a rash of bacon on his KFC chicken burger because it "offends Muslims." Will he come away with an unedited view of multiculturalism?

Also, in economically depressed suburbs and struggling regional towns, many Australians simply can't afford a cappuccino, let alone a meal at a takeaway Chinese restaurant. That is their reality - not ActNow's.

Sheltered politicians

On Thursday, February 24, 2011, I was also confronted with the fact that approval-hungry Liberals love their made-for-television multicultural scripts. Or to quote Malcolm Turnbull's spin on our ABC News: "We have achieved an extraordinary degree of harmonious integration of people from every possible culture in the world," he boasted. "It's a great achievement. We're proud of it. We are committed to a multicultural Australia - that is a reality. That's part of our life."

However, the critical-thinker outside will ask: To what extent does wealth protect the political class from reality? Or to quote from a 2009 Fairfax piece: "Mr Turnbull, a former merchant banker, is listed by BRW among Australia's richest 200 people."

You see, I know many Australians can't afford to tell the ABC (as Turnbull did, mind you) that, "We share in the Chinese New Year, the lunar New Year festival. We share in the Greek and Italian festivals. It is part of our way of life."

Advertisement

Outside of Turnbull's convenient world, the forgotten Australians share inter-ethnic street gang violence, misogynistic religions, and a general sense that not all is so peachy, beyond upper-middleclass food courts. That's part of their life, their untold story.
 

Moving forward

Sound familiar? When John Howard questioned the cult of multiculturalism our Labor-first press and even some liberal Liberals turned on him. After all, he was "old-fashioned" a curious accusation made by the nonjudgmental lovers of ancient and modern cultures.

In more recent times, though, French President Nicolas Sarkozy openly rejected multiculturalism. "It's a failure," he stressed. "The truth is that in all our democracies, we've been too concerned about the identity of the new arrivals and not enough about the identity of the country receiving them. This raises the issue of Islam and our Muslim compatriots."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel too abandoned wishful thinking when she bluntly confessed, "This (multicultural) approach has failed, utterly failed."

And, of course, so did British Prime Minister David Cameron, when he admitted, "Under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and the mainstream." Chattering endlessly about ethnic food, of course, is easier than admitting that Howard was right, and ahead of Europe, when our political classes are still so emotionally invested in their "complex" ideologies. Like the other dying faith system (apocalyptic manmade global warming) leftwing-friendly visions are hard to extricate.

Propaganda servings

Not to worry though because ActNow cares (if not for you, then certainly for Labor's cut-and-paste talking points): "ActNow is run by The Inspire Foundation, an Australian not-for-profit organisation that creates opportunities for young people to change their world" in a suspiciously leftwing way. What's more, The Inspire Foundation, was founded by Jack Heath, or the guy who worked in Parliament House Canberra as a Senior Adviser to Prime Minister Keating.

But it gets better! As an exercise in propaganda and groupthink, it ticks every box. "Australian fashion, food and culture have all been affected by multiculturalism because it makes up what it means to be Australian," concludes ActNow. If it's good, multiculturalism must be praised; if it's bad, multiculturalism is immune from criticism.

As an example of multicultural kitsch, it also shines. "Multiculturalism brings heaps of other stuff too, like exotic foods and flavours from other countries! In Sydney, Leichhardt is known as our 'Little Italy' and in Haymarket you can find anything Chinese-from Chow Mien to Hong Kong fashion." I'm sure Susie Sunshine agrees.

As an example of denial, nothing beats a Labor-leaning sermon on multicultural food, and the propaganda points I associate with groupthink.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben-Peter Terpstra has provided commentary for The Daily Caller (Washington D.C.), NewsReal Blog (Los Angeles), Quadrant (Sydney), and Menzies House (Adelaide).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben-Peter Terpstra

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy