Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

So, pro-spanking parents aren’t Nazis?

By Ben-Peter Terpstra - posted Wednesday, 13 April 2011


Thanks to the power of the internet, trying to hide pro-spanking studies is an ice-cream headache for the media.

Moreover, in Queensland, Australia, elites find little support: “The Sunday Mail-Nine News State of Families Survey has revealed that 85 per cent of people agree parents have the right to smack their children, with more than a third in ‘strong agreement’.”

But in a desperate attempt to resurrect moral equivalence, the mother who spanks her son is now compared to a child abuser. In stark contrast again, though, the media’s made-for-television soap star parent who prefers “time out” is never portrayed as a prison camp director, holding a prisoner of conscience.

Advertisement

Nor is biology important. Forgetting that our brains are still developing in our twenties, and that children respond to physical language, so-called experts are falling on their discredited arguments such as, “You wouldn’t spank an adult so why spank a child?” And this scholarly case: “Smacking doesn’t work, and you’re mean.”  

Of course, a married mother wouldn’t send her husband to his room, or allow her child to drive to school, but in the coming years, be prepared for more unhinged arguments because campaigning journalists/reporters are never wrong.

Swedish Alzheimer’s

As well, I’m going to predict that the elite media will continue to deny Sweden’s failed social experiments (a leftwing-approved Australian university tradition).  Or to quote, Theodore Kettle,  “Another study” buried by numerous newspapers and “published in the Akron Law Review last year [2009] examined criminal records and found that children raised where a legal ban on parental corporal punishment is in effect are much more likely to be involved in crime.”

Bottom line (no conscious pun intended): parental pacifism backfired in model Sweden and the cheerleaders were unable or unwilling to process the mess. What you’re unlikely to hear on Big Television: “Since the spanking ban, child abuse rates in Sweden have exploded over 500 percent, according to police reports.”

And it’s a familiar pattern. “As in climate change, politicians all over the world seem out of touch with the most rigorous science regarding parental discipline,” explains Kettle.

Advertisement

For today, media-approved experts refuse to concede that the pro-spanking parents of yesteryear reared more respectful children.  To conflate “spanking with hitting over the head with a baseball bat” is common notes James Allan, Garrick Professor of Law at the University of Queensland, in another example of Ryan-like honesty.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

94 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben-Peter Terpstra has provided commentary for The Daily Caller (Washington D.C.), NewsReal Blog (Los Angeles), Quadrant (Sydney), and Menzies House (Adelaide).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben-Peter Terpstra

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 94 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy