Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Resource allocation and the genetic revolution

By Stephen Leeder - posted Sunday, 15 October 2000


What can be done? The power of individuals and specific nations to resist global commercial depredation varies. The nature of the problem of global multinational hegemony is not uniformly well understood. But it is within the power of the people to elect governments in democracies to do their bidding. It is a matter of the greatest urgency that public health professionals perceive what is at risk and begin its advocacy in favour of local action, after thinking carefully about global issues.

In his presentation to the UNESCO Congress, McGee concluded:

It is clear that the maldistribution of public resources in health care cannot continue in the U.S. or other countries. The U.S. spends billions on genetic research and biotechnology, yet still is unable to spend pennies on public health prenatal services for all pregnant women. Americans spend millions on genetic research concerning intelligence, but find their institutions unable to spend pennies to educate the world's children to the point where comprehensive understanding of, and informed consent for, genetic services is possible. This is dangerous because it suggests that we hope for a future in which nutrition, education and environmental issues are sublimated to genetics or genomics or gene therapy.

Advertisement

A rediscovery of the notion of altruism appears to be critical, for both its actual and symbolic impact. Thus the contribution of $100M by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation toward the development of a malaria vaccine (which depends upon an understanding of the malaria genome) may point the way forward. But we have a long way to travel.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This paper was originally presented at the University of Sydney's Templeton Workshop 2000. The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Amanda Dominello in preparing this paper.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Leeder is professor of public health and community medicine at the University of Sydney, and co-director of the Menzies Centre for Health Policy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Leeder
Related Links
Department of Medicine, University of Sydney
Photo of Stephen Leeder
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy