The answer to that question lies in the question itself. Any government with a massively disproportionate military is going to have its thinking distorted by its potential capacity to strike anybody at any time. The US went into Afghanistan with guns, not to rescue the oppressed people from the brutal Islamic extremists, but as a reaction to the attack of 9-11. Something had to be done to someone. As the objective was not justified, it could not be clearly defined to either the American people or to her allies. Nine years later, it still isn’t.
Our prime ministers keep telling us that we must prevent Afghanistan from becoming a training ground for terrorists. So, they are claiming that illiterate and dirt-poor men living thousands of kilometers away are in a position to harm us. I fail to see this. And, what is so special about Afghanistan? The London bombers were “self-starters” (getting their “training” through networking rather than attending any training camp), the Bali bombers were trained in Malaysia and the perpetrators of 9-11 were trained in the US and Germany.
As in Vietnam, the Americans could not have created a bigger mess for themselves in Iraq and Afghanistan than if they had planned it that way. And there we are as always - standing by our great and powerful friend. We do attempt to gain trust and respect in the developing world through good works - but the core of our foreign policy is to cosy-up to the guy with the big guns.
Advertisement
Throughout history those religious which have become fanatical have become evil in the process. The Taliban are no different. As warriors for God, they have no perception of how evil they have become. A child crippled by a Taliban bomb becomes collateral damage in this righteous struggle for the glory of God.
But the “American way” has become a type of god. Pentagon and CIA staff labour under the delusion that it is the US as an institution which occupies the moral high ground. Children as collateral damage appears to be accommodated within that perception today as much as it did in the Vietnam War. Blind are the righteous on a mission.
Caught up in this battle-of-the-moral-high-grounds are the Iraqi women who are afraid to conceive because miscarriages, birth defects and leukemia have significantly increased since uranium dust was scattered about the land by American and British projectiles with hardened tips of depleted uranium. Unexploded bomblets from both American and British cluster bombs are lying about in the thousands. The occasional child losing a body part will be a reminder for years to come of what the West once thought of the natives in its phony bid to rescue them.
Hate is an easily tapped-into emotion no matter what one’s ethnicity. All that is required is to keep the others on their side of the fence so that they become distant enough to become mysterious and potentially dangerous. No culture is perfect and when one focuses on any cultural negativity, an exaggeration of that negativity inevitably follows. As one bumper sticker in the US says: “Nuke them all and let Allah sort them out.” So many hate Mortenson for what he is doing for Muslim children that he fears for his own children’s safety in the US.
“Let’s fry Muslim children’s faces” would not be a bumper sticker - but “Nuke them all and let Allah sort them out” is saying exactly the same thing. It reminds me of the old computer game Battleships in which the participants are completely detached from any reality.
We should have learned from the Vietnam War fiasco that the militarily-dominated US Administration acts as if playing computer games. But we haven’t.
Advertisement
Footnote
In 2009, Greg Mortenson was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. He was passed over for Barack Obama. That was on October 9, 2009. On November 30, 2009, Obama ordered 30,000 more soldiers into Afghanistan. A “humble” president accepted the prize 10 days later.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
28 posts so far.