Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

When voters elect an independent ...

By Richard Stanton - posted Wednesday, 25 August 2010


Mr Windsor provides information that indicates he is more locally focused than the others but he is keen to show that local issues translate across the whole state of New South Wales.

What is important is that the independents are seen by their constituents as stable “delegates” rather than “representatives”.

This means they take their constituency issues to parliament and argue for them, rather than operating on their own or on behalf of their party.

Advertisement

When voters elect an independent, they do so in the belief that they will get someone who will act on their behalf.

In seats where an independent is elected, individuals, community groups and local media have direct access to their MPs - a prospect citizens in most party-elected seats can only dream about. In fact local media - town newspapers, local and community radio and regional television - provide citizens with far more valuable information and far less drama than the nationals and metros.

Before an election they provide space and time for all local candidates and after the event they continue to investigate and scrutinise the actions of the elected member.

Most local media reporters and broadcasters would be laughed out of town if they attempted to take a theatrical position such as speculating that the close vote is an appeal for electoral reform.

It may be that compulsory preferential voting is not the best system in the world, nor is the Hare-Clarke system, nor the system of proportional representation, but this election result was not, as Julia Gillard argues and the mainstream media repeats, a referendum on the electoral system.

It was, however, an election in which citizens formed opinions about candidates and voted according to how they believed those candidates would behave.

Advertisement

At least this was the case in the electorates in which independents have been elected and in which they are now building relationships and framing their positions on forming government.

In this the independents must work across two levels, making the framing and relationship building far more complex than they appear on the surface.

They must balance the wishes of their electorates - the citizens, community groups and local media - with the desires of the nation.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Stanton is a political communication writer and media critic. His most recent book is Do What They Like: The Media In The Australian Election Campaign 2010.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Stanton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy