Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A decentralised Australia?

By Bryan Kavanagh - posted Tuesday, 13 July 2010


The Rudd Government recently ruled out in the strongest terms any possibility that it would introduce Ken Henry’s panel’s recommendation that a comprehensive land tax should be used to replace iniquitous taxes such as payroll tax and stamp duties. This thereby ensures that Australia will continue to pay lip service to decentralisation.

Insofar as it ignores Canberra’s brilliant genesis this is most regrettable. It wrongly assumes that people can’t be educated to the fairness of revenues based on the value of relative locational benefits.

It’s worth noting that not only would an across the board higher level of rates and land taxes assist the regions - provided other taxes are reduced or abolished accordingly - but it would also act to put a ceiling on escalating land prices and the attendant mortgage debt currently being shouldered by Australian households.

Advertisement

The latter approach to decentralisation would, of course, be anathema to the same interests that sabotaged the successful ACT experiment, which has similarity to mining billionaires labeling the proposed Resource Super Profit Tax as “another big tax” when it is, in fact, a natural resource rent.

And the economics textbooks tell us that public capture of land and resource rents can’t be passed on in prices or affect production incentives adversely. Julia Gillard’s re-naming of the miners’ “super profits tax” a “resource rent tax” seems to acknowledge this point.

Decentralisation is clearly necessary if Australia to unclog its capital cities and utilise the infrastructure available in the regions. However, many people are beginning to wonder whether a bi-polar party-political system, funded to a large extent by vested interests, is any longer capable of acting in the best interests of the Australian people.

Recent history suggests the two major parties are increasingly in the thrall of sectional interests and paid lobbyists. This has come at a great cost to the national interest and to our regional and rural areas.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published at the author's blog, The Depression, on July 2, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bryan Kavanagh is a real estate valuer and associate of the Land Values Research Group.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bryan Kavanagh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Bryan Kavanagh
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy