Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

'I’m staring at your t*ts': why sexual harassment in the workplace continues

By Melinda Tankard Reist - posted Monday, 7 June 2010


Lindy West feels the same way, thought employing even more caustic descriptions:

SATC2 takes everything that I hold dear as a woman and as a human - working hard, contributing to society ... and rapes it to death with a stiletto that costs more than my car.

Another reviewer says “the ugly smell of unexamined privilege hangs over this film like the smoke from cheap incense”.

Advertisement

In regard to the treatment of women in the workplace, American Apparel seems to think it is fine to use models depicting its own employees in sexualised photo shoots. While it’s good the Advertising Standards Board has acted on it (case report here 0141/10) there is nothing said in the ASB report about how the ad works to normalise the sexualised treatment of women in the workplace.

Then there’s the Hooters Employment Handbook, which requires female employees to agree that sexual joking is all part of the job and they won’t complain because it’s to be expected in their workplace.

If sexual harassment and objectification of female employees is going to stop, women need to take up their lawful rights and speak out. And they need to be supported, not penalised for doing so.

Call this flexibility? Slave worker women

While we’re talking about women and work, here’s another item that caused me to do a double take.

In a piece titled “Women at Work” (The Weekend Australian, May, 2010) Lyndall Crisp interviews “diversity expert” Maureen Frank who calls for more flexibility and less tokenism in our corporate culture. She says women need to be courageous, think outside the square and “put together a compelling argument about how your flexible hours would work and then approach your boss”. So far so good. So how did she “buck the system”?

Almost 10 years ago, when she found herself a single mother of twin girls aged nine months, she had to reorganise her work schedule to spend more time with them. She’d arrive at the office at 4am, leave at 4pm and be working online at 7.30pm. The cost of a full-time nanny left her, often, with only $50 at the end of the month. But it was worth it.

Advertisement

So Franks is working at least a 12-hour day, with three hours off. Gosh, all that free time to play with the babies! She’s then working again at 7.30pm. This is the deal women should fight for? This is how we are to see flexibility? This is the kind of arrangement that will attract women to go for high level jobs? So that they can be slave worker women?

I don’t think so.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in Melinda Tankard Reist's blog on June 7, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

53 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Melinda Tankard Reist is a Canberra author, speaker, commentator and advocate with a special interest in issues affecting women and girls. Melinda is author of Giving Sorrow Words: Women's Stories of Grief after Abortion (Duffy & Snellgrove, 2000), Defiant Birth: Women Who Resist Medical Eugenics (Spinifex Press, 2006) and editor of Getting Real: Challenging the Sexualisation of Girls (Spinifex Press, 2009). Melinda is a founder of Collective Shout: for a world free of sexploitation (www.collectiveshout.org). Melinda blogs at www.melindatankardreist.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Melinda Tankard Reist

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Melinda Tankard Reist
Article Tools
Comment 53 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy