Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australian universities must take the on-line learning lead

By Fiona Stewart - posted Saturday, 31 March 2001


Not only is e-learning scalable and able to reach distant people, it's the only way of updating learning in the shortest time possible. A two-year wait for a new course has become anathema in a society that needs to learn new knowledge weekly and to apply it daily.

For these reasons, e-learning is the third generation of education. The ability of our universities to reinvent themselves for this challenge deserves serious attention.

In the absence of global Australian education brand names, our universities - and our other non-traditional providers - have their work cut out. That's why they need to be innovative in securing market share. Corporate universities are one model but we also need others.

Advertisement

Take Labor's policy model of an Australian online university portal. This one-stop-shop for the online learning shopper may be useful. But it will hardly be efficient if it offers 20-plus versions of Marketing 101.

Using new technology to do the same old thing is neither innovative nor desirable. Instead, the real challenge is to decide what Australian education should be, and how many universities we should have to achieve it.

For example, are we to be the "no frills" provider of learning? Should an OzEd portal be the deliverer of a "fair deal"? Or of egalitarian/democratising products and services? There are even options such as "value for money", "greater employability potential" or "the very latest in skills upgrades".

In a knowledge society, it's new ideas such as these that are called for. With our future at stake, we can't afford not to think it up.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in the Australian Financial Review on 21 March 2001.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Fiona Stewart is Director of Realworld Research and Communications and is a consultant to corporations, universities, TAFE and schools in educational futures and e-learning. Fiona Stewart is co-author (with Philip Nitschke) of Killing Me Softly: Voluntary Euthanasia and the Road to the Peaceful Pill.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Fiona Stewart
Related Links
Fiona Stewart's homepage
Photo of Fiona Stewart
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy