It is absolutely easy for recipients to misinterpret the tone of an
e-mail that lacks the visual and aural cues of speech and the formalities
of a letter. Consider the earlier scenario of the report card and school
attendance. A response such as "will look into this as soon as I get
time" can be read in several different ways by the parent, dependent
on their state of mind or composure.
The potential risk of complaint by parents and students is high, and
perhaps dangerously high in relation to 'stressed-out' Year 12 students
whom teachers report are the greatest (and most demanding) users of
teacher-student e-mail communication at this time.
Already, teachers report receiving e-mails from Year 12 students at all
times of the day and night, including weekends and holidays. They expect
to be answered … now! What will happen when the teacher is out, away, or
just plain tired and fails to respond? What if the student feels their
major assessment mark has suffered due to the lack of response by the
teacher? Accusations of professional negligence?
Advertisement
These are the areas of threat to job security, especially in
independent schools where some students/ parents have unrealistic
expectations and/or undue influence.
The possibility of making errors with expression, tone and/or content
compounds with the pressure for speedy, perhaps hasty, response. The
expectation for quick response does not apply to other forms of
communication between teachers and parents and students, it is part of the
e-world mantra. Schools must question the e-mail expectation or run the
risk of increasing complaint and decreasing staff morale.
And all of this raises the question of what type of student is being
created? A student who takes responsibility for study and problem solving?
Who develops independence in learning? Or one who becomes dependent,
complacent and lazy because they can always get another assignment sheet,
or answer, or direction, with just a few clicks of the finger?
It is time to think, discuss, and then to take action to achieve
sensible and reasonable protocols in schools that allow the benefits of
e-mail communication to be retained, but that avoid the risks teachers
foresee if authorities refuse to listen.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.