Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Marketing creativity as a commodity

By Malcolm King - posted Friday, 6 November 2009

Some years ago I asked a well-known Australian writing teacher to write an article for The Age on how she taught creativity in her classes.

She looked perplexed and then said she could write an article on the importance of social interaction in creative writing classes but she did not teach students how to be creative.

That story came back to me on a hot summer evening ripping vines off the roof of my house on the north coast of New South Wales.


Can creativity be taught?

The question can’t be answered from current curriculums in universities. They provide the courses and resources for students but they do not teach anything about creativity or the creative process. Universities build “3D creative games incubators” or “design labs” but these are institutional cages where they hope creativity will happen, much like putting pandas in a zoo and hoping they will mate.

We know creativity when we see or hear it. To coin a phrase from the 1970s, it has the shock of the new, or it is elegant or beautiful.

Yet after 12 years of study I cannot say that I know how the creative process works. Some of the greatest art I have ever seen was produced by schizophrenics and five-year-old children - and more kudos to them.

Writers on creativity usually avoid trying to define what creativity is and instead specify particular types and degrees of creativity.

American academic Richard Florida, for example, identifies a "super-creative core" within the creative class to distinguish those who "fully engage in the creative process". What ever that is.


Included in this category are scientists, engineers, poets, novelist, artists, entertainers, designers, architects, non-fiction writers, editors, researchers and software programmers. Yet this is still too broad to be useful. Is the creativity of a poet really the same as that of an engineer?

What Florida refers as the creative class is essentially a new name for knowledge workers born from post industrial technological change.

US sociologist Daniel Bell in The Coming of Post-Industrial Society back in 1973 argued that knowledge would become the primary driver of economic prosperity.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

First published in The Australian on October 21, 2009.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy