Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

'Kevin Rudd is my Facebook friend ...'

By Greg Barns - posted Tuesday, 29 September 2009

“Kevin Rudd is my Facebook friend and I get Malcolm Turnbull’s twitters each day”, says the excited political junkie. It makes them feel important and part of the political process.

But it is a sham really. If one accepts that democratic engagement is a desirable thing in our society, then the Internet is not the be all and end all. It has not to date, and will not in the foreseeable future, inject and renewed sense of civic wellbeing. That is not to say it is not a very useful tool for democratising freedom of speech and providing a voice for those who have previously not had one (although this is perhaps a little exaggerated given the lack of Internet capacity in many parts of the developing world), but let’s keep it in perspective.

Politicians like Mr Rudd and Mr Turnbull use the Internet because it is politically advantageous to do so, although in the case of the latter he has had a long fascination with the internet and was a partner in the highly successful Ozemail a decade ago. That a voter is their “friend” on Facebook does not mean anything, other than that technology has corrupted the idea of “friendship” and all that it traditionally entails. And twittering does not mean one is up close and personal with Mr Turnbull, but simply that one is privy to whatever mediated observation he is twittering on about at a given point in time.


And do social networking sites like Facebook and tools such as Twitter increase knowledge and therefore understanding of the issues that our democracy deals with on a day-to-day basis? Probably not. That this is so was confirmed in a paper delivered at this month’s annual American Political Science Association meeting in Canada.

Jessica T. Feezell, Meredith Conroy and Mario Guerrero of the University of California Santa Barbara, in a paper entitled Facebook is ... Fostering Political Engagement: A Study of Online Social Networking Groups and Offline Participation, found that while Facebook and other online networking tools do what traditional forms of political engagement such as physical meetings and protests do; they do not necessarily value add by increasing the knowledge base of the participants and nor do they foster the capacity of an individual to think differently about an issue. And there is less accountability among participants in online political groups, the researchers found.

The paper notes that the Internet “does not bring people into physical contact or require as much commitment from its members, and this has potentially harmful associated effects”. It then observes:

If we apply this logic to group membership online, it suggests that online groups may be unlikely to hold members accountable. Not only do members of online groups not meet face to face, but members of online groups can choose to be anonymous, or have multiple or false identities. This can have negative effects on one’s online community … individuals who are anonymous or have multiple identities online are less likely to maintain their online identities and as a result be unlikely to contribute in a meaningful way to an online community. These findings also suggest that elements of political engagement may be hindered as a result.

Allied to this finding is the troubling observation the authors make about the limited capacity of online social networking tools to educate and increase knowledge in the democratic sphere.

“The fundamentals of democracy assume a knowledgeable public, one that is capable of representing its own self-interest effectively,” the authors write. “A healthy democracy, then, should see tandem movement between political knowledge and political participation. Here we find that while online group membership predicts increased levels of offline political participation, we do not see an equally significant effect on levels of political knowledge,” they note.


And the reason for this? “The content analysis of group wall posts offers a suggestion for why this might be the case. The information content and quality of most wall posts were found to be very poor, generally lacking support for their claims, incoherent, or simply opinionated. In other words, group members are exposed to little new or well-articulated information about the political causes around which these groups form. The information is more likely to be reinforcing and therefore mobilising, but not enlightening and therefore educational.”

This is of course only one piece of research but for anyone who spends time in the online world of political discourse it rings true. And what it tells us is that despite the promise of the Web 2.0 as a transformative one for our democracy so far the results have been either disappointing, or predictable, depending on your point of view.

Democracy is a complex beast. And getting a communication saturated public to engage at something more than a trite level with it, requires something deeper than the promise of a Facebook encounter with a political leader.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Greg Barns is National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Greg Barns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Greg Barns
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy