Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Dark clouds gather over coal’s future

By David Spratt - posted Friday, 11 September 2009


It just doesn't add up. A recent Harvard University study finds that electricity costs could double for first-generation CCS plants. At the same time, innovation continues to lower the cost of renewables at an estimated 10 per cent a decade, and increasing scale of plants is also moving that cost curve down.

China says it is more interested in spending resources on energy efficiency and building renewable energy capacity than adding CCS to coal power stations. It plans a national feed-in tariff for large-scale solar plants by the end of 2009, paying up to half of the price of solar power systems of more than 500 megawatts, with support rising to 70 per cent in remote regions.

“The idea that carbon capture has to happen in China is a western idea”, says Stanford University researcher Richard Morse.

Advertisement

Former Queensland premier Peter Beattie, now his state's trade commissioner in Los Angeles, says time is running out for coal: "the traditional markets for its product will start slowly shutting down as green energy becomes more price-competitive and public policy continues to demand greener outcomes." The result in the United States is that plans for 100 coal-fired power plants have been stopped in the last 18 months.

The writing is on the wall. Robin Batterham of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences says that if within three years from now "we don't see some of these large-scale plants actually happening, then people are going to say, 'This is not a real alternative'."

Large scale CCS plants in three years is a pipe dream, a bad bet.

Clean coal has become a cargo cult, but what may descend from the skies is less likely to be salvation than the recognition that the dirty, big cloud overhead is killing our planet’s wonderful diversity of life and habitat.

That fence around Hazelwood is locking in a disaster, but it will not keep its critics at bay.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Age on September 10, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Spratt is the co-author of Climate Code Red: the case for emergency action published by Scribe in July 2008, and shortlisted for the 2009 Victorian Premier’s Literary Awards. He is a researcher for CarbonEquity, an activist network advocating carbon rationing and personal carbon allowances as a fair and effective response to global warming. Recent CarbonEquity reports include Avoiding catastrophe: recent science and new data on global warming and The two degree target: how far should carbon emissions be cut?.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Spratt

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy