Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The nadir of democracy in the ALP

By Marko Beljac - posted Thursday, 10 September 2009


No, Maddox and Battin can only be excused for lacking imagination. The ALP, as the cliché goes, has been a broad church composed of many who could not be characterised as socialists even though the party did have a socialist objective for most of its history. I say, however, from this broad church take your pick of any doctrine and you shall find that neoliberalism is not compatible with it. Neoliberalism is at variance not only with socialism but with social democracy and laborism as well. Maddox and Battin are right, but they only scratch the surface because of their exclusive focus on socialism.

The best indicator of this is the Democratic Labor Party, the party formed out of the anti-communist industrial groups and which still exists today. The DLP opposes neoliberalism. On the bread and butter issues of political economy the DLP is to the left of the "modern" ALP. In fact, the DLP is to the left of the "socialist left" of the ALP. A Santamaria would be to the left of a Lindsay Tanner, the socialist deregulator, not to mention a Julia Gillard.

The recent national conference of the ALP saw the process of de-democratisation reach new heights. Brand Rudd grandly came and went. At least Hawke and Keating stayed. Even Stalin tried to play the modest comrade at Communist Party congresses (when he bothered to have them that is). For the leaders most of the agenda of the conference was supposed to be dedicated to further oiling the Rudd personality cult. The scene was set with another essay, no doubt which the Fairfax press was both surprised and gratified to receive, from the philosopher king whom the similarly vainglorious Robert Manne could describe as being an "intellectual in politics struggling simultaneously both to understand and to help transform his world".

Advertisement

Lindsay Tanner, when he took control of the Federated Clerks Union away from those more to left end of the spectrum than he, had accurately stated that the national conference is about as relevant for the ordinary party member as the UN Security Council.

I note that he made no significant attempt to address this at the conference despite now being a senior cabinet minister and thereby in a position to do so. He did at least attend the "fringe conference" but we should take note of his performance. He decided to deliver a sermon on cognitive biases and rationality. I am sure that during his "speed dating" sessions with top business leaders, in themselves a disgrace, he did not provide a vulgarised rendition of pop Tversky and Kahneman. Surely he rather sought to address their concrete interests and concerns.

When delegates to the conference expressed their opposition to the pro-rich agenda of the Henry Tax review Brand Rudd smugly announced on radio, as far away from the conference as he possibly could, that the sentiments of the conference shall basically be ignored. This action on his part both demonstrates that the ALP is not a democratic party and the reasons why it is not a democratic party.

A truly democratic working class party would not have tax cuts for the rich and big business at the centrepiece of its tax reform agenda. For it to be so, democracy must be eroded.

For those who would rather see the ALP return to its working class roots and shift away from neoliberalism the remedy, in light of these facts, should be clear. The ALP needs a movement for democracy dedicated to in placing not only the preselection of candidates but also the framing of policy to its genuine members. A democratic revolution can only come from a grassroots movement. No solace will be found either in a new faction or in any of the existing factions.

The ALP requires a members union which would seek to advance the rights of the membership through traditional union means such as dissidence, picketing, direct action and strikes. The recent fringe conference is the most exciting thing that has happened in the ALP for many, many a year. The members are stirring. Only they can turn the ALP away from neoliberalism.

Advertisement

Hell, the fringe conference has even me thinking of re-joining the ALP.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Beljac teaches at Swinburne University of Technology, is a board member of the New International Bookshop, and is involved with the Industrial Workers of the World, National Tertiary Education Union, National Union of Workers (community) and Friends of the Earth.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Marko Beljac

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Marko Beljac
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy