In some countries women aren’t allowed to wear swimsuits. How does that make you feel? This was the question put to Aussie finalist, Rachel Finch, in the Q&A section of the Miss Universe contest.
It’s not a bad question to ask oneself. Simple but direct, it cuts straight to the heart of one of the great gender inequality issues faced by women in the world today. Finch drew breath and proceeded to answer:
"Ummm I believe wearing a swimsuit, especially as a part of a beauty pageant, is a beautiful thing. It gives everyone of us the chance to show our figures and our toned bodies and what we have worked hard for and I think our bodies are a beautiful part of a woman and we should definitely, you know, show them to the rest of the world."
Advertisement
The crowd liked her answer, even if it did sound a little contrived. It was also refreshing to hear a Miss Universe contestant admit that looking that good takes a lot of hard work (be it in the gym, the make up chair, or the surgeon’s office).
But the answer was not enough to get her across the line and top honours went, for the second year running, to Miss Venezuela. Like Finch, Miss Venezuela was also asked to wax lyrical on a feminist topic:
“In many parts of the world obstacles still exist that impede women from achieving their goals in some corporations. What can women do to overcome this?”
After the question was translated, Miss Venezuela responded; “I believe that nowadays we women have overcome many obstacles and I do believe that we have reached the same level as men have. We must realise that there are no longer any barriers amongst us.”
In fairness to Miss Venezuela, she probably had not heard a translation of the question put to Miss Australia only moments prior. If she had, perhaps she would have paused before espousing that women have achieved equality and that “there are no longer any barriers” for women. After all, we can hardly claim that women have achieved equality - in the corporate world or anywhere else - when their bodies are still being policed and their freedom is still being suppressed.
But perhaps the most curious part of all this was the judges decision to ask the feminist questions, only to reward the answer that denied any need for contemporary feminism. Of course pageants are notorious for being won by women who speak in politically correct, inoffensive platitudes (especially if they drop in the expression “world peace”) and this is exactly how Miss Venezuela’s answer came across.
Advertisement
But there is something deeply concerning about rewarding women who pay lip service to the gender-equality myth that says that women have already achieved equality. Even in a first world country like Australia a quick look at the statistics shows that women still have a long way to go.
Aside from the fact that women earn 16 per cent less than men, that abortion is still a criminal offence in certain states, and the fact that women do the bulk of unpaid labour in the home, it’s worth noting that violence against women and children costs this country an estimated $13.6 billion a year. These are sobering facts that all women should be aware of.
Yet despite this, young girls are still being taught that women have achieved equality, that the fight is over, and that feminism is like fluoride: you don’t need to worry about it because it’s already in the water.
The result of this is a generation of young girls who think that their rights are innate and inalienable, when in actual fact many of their rights have only recently been obtained and, in some instances, are still highly vulnerable.
Perhaps one answer is to teach girls the history of their rights in high school. When I left school in 2001, I knew all about the civil rights movement in America, I’d successfully memorised Martin Luther-King’s “I have a dream” speech and I knew all about slavery and segregation. What I didn’t know was that Australian women had only relatively recently achieved the right to serve on a jury.
Our history books just didn’t cover that stuff and, even worse, when the history books did mention the experiences of women, it was often as an afterthought or in an addendum chapter titled something like “Women and the war” or “Women and the Depression” (as though all the other chapters applied to men and men alone).
Perhaps the school syllabus could include a compulsory module on the history of women’s rights in Australia, similar to the compulsory module on the history of Aboriginal experiences. And it would be great if the accompanying text book included a chapter on the history of the bikini.