Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Slavery: lessons from history

By MA Khan - posted Thursday, 30 July 2009


It’s popular wisdom that the only slavery existing in history is that of the European black slave trade, whereby European traders captured and transported black Africans to the New World (Americas, West Indies).

Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan terms the trans-Atlantic slave-trade “worst and most cruel slavery” in history, adding that some white Americans do not know that “they are in the privileged position … based on what happened to us (Blacks)” in the past.

An overwhelming majority of Muslims believe that Islamic history is devoid of the abhorrent practice of slavery. Rocky Davis (aka Shahid Malik), an Australian Aboriginal convert to Islam, told ABC Radio that “Christianity were the founders of slavery. Not Islam.”

Advertisement

Indeed, from my own experience of living as a Muslim for 35 years, this is one of the major reasons why anti-West hatred is so strong among Muslims.

When Muslims in India talk about the practice of slavery in the subcontinent, they talk about the harrowing tales of how the Portuguese transported slaves from coastal areas of Goa, Kerala and Bengal in terrible conditions, and nothing else.

However, when I investigated, I was shocked to discover that Muslims - armed with divine and prophetic sanctions - practised slavery more extensively and just as tragically, which I have discussed in my recent book, Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion Imperialism and Slavery.

It is fortunate that President Barack Obama, visiting a former slave-trading fort in Ghana on July 11, condemned the European slave trade as a dark chapter in human history, describing it rightly as a “great evil”, adding “As African-Americans, there is a special sense that … this place was a place of profound sadness …”

Obama also pointed to a church, standing next to slave-dungeons, to show how European Christians, with sanctions from the church, engaged in black slavery.

This popular paradigm excludes three major facts about slavery:

Advertisement
  1. black slavery was not the only slavery in history. The Arabs, Turks, Indians and even millions of Europeans were also reduced to slavery during the same period and before, with added dimensions of sex-slavery and castration. And the perpetrators were Muslims, not Europeans;
  2. black slaves were not shipped to the New World alone; a greater number were sent to the Islamic world; and
  3. even in the trans-Atlantic slave-trade, Muslims were complicit and played a cruel role.

Islamic history informs us that Prophet Mohammed himself, armed with affirmed and reaffirmed divine sanctions, initiated Islamic slavery by enslaving the women and children of a number of Arabian tribes (Quraiza, Khaybar, Mustaliq and Hawazin etc.). Later, as Islamic power grew, slavery witnessed a tremendous burst on the world stage. Everywhere Muslims won victory, the women and children of the vanquished were enslaved in massive numbers. General Musa enslaved 300,000 in his conquest of North Africa in 698 and returned from his conquest of Spain in 715 with the Caliph’s one-fifth share of the booty that included 30,000 white virgins from the Visigothic nobility alone; while Sultan Mahmud returned from his invasion of India in 1001-02 CE with 500,000 enslaved women and children. This is only a tip of the iceberg.

No small victims of Islamic slavery were Europeans themselves, who started falling victim to Islamic assaults in the Mediterranean islands within two decades after Mohammed’s death. And it continued well into the 19th century: the Ottomans, even in their decisive defeat and retreat from the Gates of Vienna in 1683, returned with 80,000 white captives, while Barbary pirates enslaved up to 1.5 million Europeans between the 1530s and 1820s, from European merchant-ships off the North African coast, plus from slave-raiding expeditions to coastal villages and islands of Europe.

Even American merchant-ships and their crew suffered horrible Barbary depredations and enslavements. Prior to independence, Britain negotiated the release of captured American ship-crews whenever possible by paying a heavy ransom. After 1776, America signed treaties with Barbary States for securing safety of her ships by paying a hefty “tribute”.

To placate Muslims in his recent Cairo speech, President Obama touted this humiliating treaty on America’s part as a respectful past relationship between Islam and America. As demand for higher ransoms and depredations of US ships continued, America had to engage in a difficult war to stop the enslavement of Americans in North Africa. Putting an end to the continued enslavement of Europeans was a major reason behind France’s invasion of Morocco in 1830.

It’s noteworthy that the Europeans, Obama’s exclusive target of condemnation for slavery, were subjected to Islamic enslavement for some eight centuries, before they themselves embarked on the practice of the widely condemned trans-Atlantic slave-trade.

Moreover, even in the European slave-trade in Africa, it was Muslims - the well-established masters of slave-hunting, -breeding and -trading for many centuries - who supplied more than 80 per cent of the slaves to European traders, who then purchased and transported them.

What is accurate about Obama’s statement about slavery in Ghana is that European slavery was “where the journey of much of African-American experience began”. The cruel aspect aside, it left a positive end of some kind: the Black Diaspora in the new world are definitely more fortunate today than their left-behind brethren.

But there was another African slave-journey lasting longer and larger in magnitude that began with the Arab Muslim invasion of Africa in the 7 and 8th centuries. And it has left behind no residue whatsoever: an extermination of humans in huge numbers - thanks to universal castration of black male-slaves destined for Islamic markets.

The inhumanity of Islamic castration of African men wasn’t the robbing of their most natural identity and endowment, i.e. their manhood, alone, but the mortality associated with castration of about 75 per cent. Overall the mortality-rate of black slaves headed to the Islamic world, from procurement to reaching the destination, was as high as 90 per cent: their mortality in transportation by Europeans to the New World was about 10 per cent.

Obama’s condemnation of European-Christian slavery, a horror chapter in history, is laudable, but his exclusion of Islam, a partner in the same crime, is not. It does gross injustice to those unfortunate souls who suffered. Those souls include millions of Christian Europeans, the ones who are his sole target of condemnation.

European slavery has been thoroughly condemned by all and sundry - Europeans, non-Europeans, Christians or Muslims, scholars or laymen. And despite, Europe’s role in its abolition and from where slavery has been effectively abolished, anti-slavery campaigners have longed called on today’s Europeans to assume responsibility and take concrete actions, such as reparations, to combat slavery’s destructive legacy. But Islam - whose role in slavery is bigger and more tragic - remains thoroughly untouched as if Islam and its followers were/are untouched by the vice of slavery.

In fact, some Islamic countries (Mauritania, Saudi Arabia and Sudan) have continued practising slavery to this day, while Sudan has intensified its trade in recent decades. Some 600,000 souls in Mauritania remain shackled in slavery with no hope for liberation in sight, while tens of thousands of Christians, Animists and Muslims have been kidnapped and reduced to slavery in Sudan since Islamists came to power in 1985 (Khan, Islamic Jihad, p. 347-49).

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

MA Khan holds an MA in Journalism. He is an independent researcher and writer. He is author of Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by MA Khan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy