Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

TXTNG - new language - new literacy

By Dale Spender - posted Friday, 24 July 2009


But maybe we should also ask: would Shakespeare have been a txter?

Even if students concluded that Shakespeare translated more readily into Hip Hop and rap rather than txt messaging they would still be exploring the new literacies and testing their limits. And far from being evidence of their inability to work with the language, such creative uses of the old and the new genres would expand their insights and understandings - and their use of the full range of literacies.

Who knows - they may prove to be as creative with Shakespearean text as they were with the mobile text. 2 b or not 2 b!

Advertisement

The end of spelling

Many critics who argue that txtng undermines or destroys spelling are ignoring the basic patterns of language change. Language has always been modified to make processing simpler and “faster” (a growing pressure in the information age): we don’t get the same media moans over CSIRO, VIP, NY, BBC, UNICEF, and so on, that are part of our everyday world.

There are no headline stories about the way the use of ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) or Mrs (Mistress) is impacting on spelling. It cannot be said that those who txt can’t spell any more than it could be said that those who use shorthand can’t spell. Formal spelling is one code, txtng is another! Both are based on symbols standing for words. And while formal spelling may have been an asset in a print-based society, shortened versions are perfectly suitable in a digital one.

Besides spelling errors are much more likely to be present in handwriting than txt messages as most modern phones have spell check.

And as for the claims that txtng makes it impossible to understand the message - the txt can speak for itself:

f u cn rd ths thn wats the prblm

Advertisement

Abbreviations, initials, acronyms

This is another source of irritation to those who find it difficult to appreciate the value of txtng or to decode txt messages. They themselves may be able to write their own traditional abbreviations - Mrs, Mr, Dr (to name but a few) - but they object in principle to any new forms.

Likewise they may each day use GFC (Girls Friendly Society?) CBA, ABC, am or pm - or even VIP or RIP without even noticing the abbreviation. These contracted forms become the symbol or the code - just as txt does.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dale spender is a researcher and writer on education and the new technologies.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Dale Spender

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy