In Paul Krugman’s words, right now, “knowledge is our only defence against catastrophe”. A natural reaction would be to retreat into timidity. But that would repeat mistakes that exacerbated the Great Depression by giving in to our fears and phobias. IMF Chief Economist Olivier Blanchard has a similarly blunt message. “Above all, adopt clear policies and act decisively. Do too much rather than too little.”
Of course other things being equal it’s better for governments to be debt free. But as any homebuyer knows, debt can help us build assets now that we couldn’t otherwise afford, and repay the costs when the assets bear fruit. Australia entered this crisis relatively well placed to weather the storm. In addition to the recent mineral boom, for 25 years Australian governments have consistently stressed fiscal responsibility and taken large political risks doing what they thought right for Australia, for instance with tax reform and fiscal austerity during the mid 1980s and again in the mid to late 1990s.
Many developed countries were already running cash deficits and had substantial public debt before the financial crisis. However, all of them have accepted one lesson of the Great Depression - that during a downturn we should let the “automatic stabilisers” work by loosening budgets temporarily as revenue falls and outlays on welfare relief increase.
Given Australia’s relatively stronger balance sheet, it’s been in a better position to engineer additional discretionary fiscal stimulus than most comparable countries. Cash handouts of nearly 2 per cent of GDP are being paid to middle and lower income Australians. There is no more effective way to stimulate the economy quickly. The success of this measure can be seen in the relative strength of Australian retail sales compared with almost any of our peers. In addition the Government plans to spend many billions more on infrastructure.
All this has converted a sizable expected cash surplus next financial year into a deficit of nearly 5 per cent of GDP. This compares with the average of our peers of nearly 9 per cent. On current Treasury projections, which seem as plausible as any (though like all such forecasts, they are only “best guesses”), net debt will stay below 14 per cent of GDP compared with an average of over five times this in comparable countries which nevertheless retain their creditworthiness in capital markets. Ultimately if other countries run weaker balance sheets than us, that’s no reason to relax our own standards. But the comparison does provide some context. It illustrates that even after the stimulus, we remain within a very healthy margin of safety in our Government’s reputation for economic prudence.
None of this is to suggest that Australia should rest on its laurels. There’s a fair chance (but no more than that) that our economy will recover strongly within two years. But just as we don’t know today how far or fast interest rates should be increased then, we don’t know today precisely how fast we should be returning towards budget surplus then. So these debates need to go on and there will come a time when we need to change direction, from supporting economic growth to restraining it, perhaps with great vigour. But that time is certainly not now.
Further, as Australia’s population and infrastructure needs grow, Australians must decide whether they prefer a balance sheet more suited to genteel decline or one that supports investment, dynamism and growth. In addition to building genuinely valuable assets in R&D and carbon abatement, our education, health and transport systems and housing stock, the stimulus will, in Treasury’s words keep up to 210,000 Australians in work who would otherwise be out of jobs. Major infrastructure projects should also pass independent and transparent benefit/cost assessment.
Deploying our strong balance sheet to use otherwise idle resources - or to put it more compellingly, deserted factories and unemployed workers - to build assets that improve our lives and our economy in the future, seems much more appealing; much more commonsensical than retreating into phobias.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
6 posts so far.
About the Author
Fred Argy, Former Head of EPAC;
Paul Binsted, Company Director and Economist;
Tony Cole, Former Secretary to the Treasury;
Max Corden, Emeritus Professor, Johns Hopkins University;
Owen Covick, Associate Professor, Flinders University;
Steve Dowrick, Professor of Economics, ANU;
Saul Eslake, Chief Economist, ANZ Bank;
John Foster, Professor of Economics, University of Queensland;
Bernie Fraser, Former Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia and Secretary to the Treasury;
John Freebairn, Professor of Economics, University of Melbourne;
Joshua Gans, Professor of Economics, Melbourne University;
Paul J. Gollan, Associate Professor, Macquarie University;
Roy Green, Professor, Dean, Faculty of Business, University of Technology, Sydney;
Stephen Grenville, Former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of Australia;
Nicholas Gruen, CEO, Lateral Economics;
Tony Harris, Former Auditor General of NSW;
Stephen Koukoulas, Global Strategist, TD Securities;
Andrew Leigh, Professor of Economics, ANU;
John Quiggin, Professor and ARC Federation Fellow, University of Qld;
Mike Waller, Former Chief Economist, BHP Billiton;
Glenn Withers, Adjunct Professor, Australian National University.