Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Are Indigenous perpetrators homogeneous?

By Stephen Hagan - posted Thursday, 4 June 2009


In particular I criticised the farcical and offensively lenient one-month sentence handed down by Northern Territory Chief Justice Brian Martin to the 55-year-old Aboriginal Elder for his hideous crime.

The court heard the elder was promised the girl when she was four, and became angry when he heard she had struck up a friendship with an 18-year-old man in June 2004. He beat her with a boomerang, then took her to his remote out-station - where he lived with his first wife - and forced her to have anal sex.

On sentencing the elder on August 11, 2005, Chief Justice Martin took into account the fact the girl was the man’s promised wife under Ngarinaman law. He said he was satisfied the man believed the sexual assault was acceptable because the girl had been promised to him and had reached the age of 14.

Advertisement

I noted in my article how obtuse Chief Justice Martin’s ruling was when statutory law states that it is a criminal offence to have a sex with anyone under the age of 16.

I made this observation as I felt Chief Justice Martin’s excuse to down grade this abhorrent sexual assault on a child to the status of a minor crime, because it was done under Aboriginal lore, in fact makes a mockery of western law.

This appalling example of sexual abuse and many other similar acts of depravity against our children that occur habitually around this country clearly demonstrates that Indigenous traditional mores have been conveniently misinterpreted and misused by some Indigenous men, with tainted intent, who have an inflated view of themselves and their standing in their community.

It was never a cultural trait to wilfully violate the innocence of our children or brutalise our women, and it never will be. Those who do so should feel the full weight of western law and not an expediently diluted version of traditional lore.

I don’t believe that Indigenous perpetrators are homogeneous but I do believe there are some of our men and women who need to take a hard look at themselves and seriously consider giving up alcohol and/or drugs and/or gambling and/or their insane jealousy conspiracy theories for the sake of their family and also for their financial, physical and mental well being.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

26 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Hagan is Editor of the National Indigenous Times, award winning author, film maker and 2006 NAIDOC Person of the Year.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Hagan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Stephen Hagan
Article Tools
Comment 26 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy