Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Labor-Liberal amalgamation: Tasmania’s future?

By Peter Henning - posted Thursday, 28 May 2009


That is the political context in Tasmania (and elsewhere in Australia, as exemplified by the Greens’ success in the single-member seat of Fremantle - a Labor stronghold since 1924) of Robin Gray’s call for a joining of the Labor-Liberal accord in a more formal arrangement, and it is a call to push all social-environmental-economic considerations away in the interests of one predominant driver in the way our land, water and air are used and abused, and the one predominant driver in the way huge amounts of public funds are misdirected, misused and wasted.

This is no way for Tasmania to move into the future, whether urged by Robin Gray or Michael Field. This is the way to create the next exodus of our youth, large segments of our workforce and those who would seek something better for their families.

It is not a merger of Labor-Liberal that holds the promise for a better Tasmania. It is their transformation or their replacement that is required.

Advertisement

We are living in a time when the ecological and the social are two faces of the same dilemma, and to deny that is to merely strengthen the system of power which has no other objective than to maintain the status quo of its privileges, the inequitable distribution of wealth, social division and a trap of rust-belt decline.

Herve Kempf, a senior journalist with Le Monde, France’s most influential daily newspaper, wrote this in 2007 in relation to the important issues we need to come to grips with in Tasmania if we are to restore proper standards of governance, proper political representation of people, and proper democratic processes as the basis of our future policy development:

The compromise with free-market fundamentalism has led the left to so totally adopt the values of free-market liberalism that it no longer dares - except in the most cautious terms - to deplore social inequality. On top of that the left displays an almost cartoonish refusal to engross itself in environmental issues. The left remains pickled in the idea of progress as it was conceived in the 19th century … and intones the chant of economic growth without the slightest trace of critical thinking. Moreover “social capitalism” rather than “social democracy” is the more apposite term. Nevertheless, can the challenges of the 21st century be addressed by the currents of tradition other than the ones which identified inequality as its primary motive for revolt? This hiatus is at the heart of political life. The left will be reborn by uniting the causes of inequality and the environment …

Robin Gray’s call should serve as a question to Tasmanians to ask what Labor-Liberal means in policy terms, and in the way in which public funds should be distributed in the public interest.

Gray’s call should also serve as a question about the purposes of parliamentary processes in Tasmania under a Labor-Liberal accord, given that under the current administration one of those purposes is a tactical one which has systematically abused and undermined democratic conventions for personal and partisan self interest. This is not even worth a debate. It is a truism.

It is time for all Tasmanians who believe our collective future should hold something better than a progressively weakened democracy, and a political party system that cannot be trusted to respect, value and protect the fundamental social needs of its citizens, to work to ensure that the 2010 election prevents these circumstances being allowed to continue.

Advertisement

Otherwise, as has happened so often in Tasmania’s past, Tasmania will be a good place to leave, and a good place to stay away from.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

First published in the Tasmanian Times on May 25, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Henning is a former teacher and historian. He is a former Tasmanian olive grower, living in Melbourne.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Henning

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy