Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Curing trachoma means eliminating poverty

By Harry Throssell - posted Thursday, 2 April 2009


McLaughlin: “The National Trachoma and Eye Health Program ran for only three years in the late 1970s and screened more than 60,000 Indigenous Australians. It was directed by the late Professor Fred Hollows, who had always maintained his rage about the widespread and needless blindness caused by trachoma”.

McLaughlin said the screening team was finding more than 20 per cent of Aboriginal children up to 14 years had obvious signs of trachoma.

Katrina Roper of the Centre for Disease Control reported there had not been many full-scale studies of the level of scarring and trichiasis in older people. The condition was “a reflection on their poverty, their lack of access to water, lack of basic hygiene capabilities within some communities, due to distance, remoteness, infrastructure. It is disturbing that it is still a problem.”

Advertisement

The screening program was also supporting research by Cambridge University which was trialling a kit, like a pregnancy test, which instantly reveals the presence of trachoma. At present, the only certain test for trachoma is by DNA analysis, which can take weeks in a distant laboratory.

Professor Taylor has served on a World Health Organisation committee which reviews global progress on the elimination of trachoma. He reports his international peers say to him “Hugh, how can this still be a problem in Australia, a rich affluent country, a donor nation? How can there still be trachoma in the Aboriginal communities?”

He added “It's shocking to me to go back to some communities and find that nothing has changed in the last 25 or 30 years since we first worked in those communities”.

In his autobiography Fred Hollows said very few young people were actually blinded by trachoma, but some had undergone enucleation, removal of an eye.

When British atomic bomb tests were taking place in Western deserts some Indigenous communities were exposed to a plume, or cloud, of radiation fall-out. Blind man Yumi was a member of one such community. The question Hollows asked was: “did the exposure to radiation contribute to his blindness? An Aboriginal kid was blinded by trachoma and the same kid was exposed, at a particularly vulnerable age in respect of his immunological system, to radiation. How many such subjects were there? Babies and adults aplenty, scandalously. But how many young people, infected with trachoma, moving into the age zone when the immune system will contain or repel the disease, but not quite there? Very few. Of course, the authorities argued that the two things were unrelated. The South Australian authorities claimed that Yumi Lester's blindness was caused by measles - but that was their explanation for almost all Aboriginal eye disease. They were the people who told me to expect a 1 per cent trachoma incidence among Aboriginal kids whereas I found 80 per cent.”

Hollows found a good deal of follicular trachoma in Nepal for much the same reasons as in Aboriginal Australia - poor living conditions, inadequate water for washing, overcrowding. Seven women to every man were in this condition because of poor hygiene in the crèche. “The women were spending a lot of time among pus and other secretions, passing the chylamidial infection around.”

Advertisement

He reported trachoma in England was initially called “Egyptian ophthalmia” because it was thought that it had been introduced into Britain by seamen returning from the Battle of the Nile. It was these cases that led to the establishment of the first eye hospital at Moorfields in London.

“Whether that account of the origin of the disease in England is true or not, it was certainly the case that trachoma was widespread among the poor in Egypt. We were taken on a tour of some villages about 30 kilometres from Alexandria by a professor of ophthalmology. I took my magnifiers and torch and I was shocked to see many five-year-old children with advanced conjunctival scarring. Many of them were certainly on the road to trachomatous blindness. The people were subsistence farmers living in the most appalling conditions - no clean running water to the houses and the water they washed in was downstream from where people and animals urinated and defecate.”

For millennia poor conditions have produced poor health.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Harry Throssell originally trained in social work in UK, taught at the University of Queensland for a decade in the 1960s and 70s, and since then has worked as a journalist. His blog Journospeak, can be found here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Harry Throssell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy